Hi Gatica78, thank you for your contribution! There's quite a bit of good work in there.

There's one place I'm the most recent editor, and I have current local knowledge, where you used old imagery and recreated features that no longer exist: The construction area for the Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering Building.

In future, please check whether there's a marked construction area, and check for the most recent imagery when adding features. Thank you!

I'll make fixes in that area to make it again represent what is actually there at present.

Welcome to OSM! Please only map objects that actually exist. I've removed some that seem pretty clearly fictional. If this is in error, please reply here and help us understand why you drew them. Thanks!

This looks like an incorrect edit -- adding nonexistent and/or overlapping objects with the editor's name, moving established objects. Reverted.

I've reverted your edit, because you deleted part of a street, and misclassified an existing service road as a motorway.

Welcome to OSM, but please take care to make only reasonable edits when you edit our shared map.

I'm reverting this change because it's incorrect. The driveway as previously drawn is accurate. The driveway you've drawn in this changeset is the old driveway, since removed. Check the Esri World and either Maxar imagery sets to see the newer driveway. I've driven both driveways, so I know which one is newer.

I have concerns with your converting former primary roads wholesale into trunk roads, especially where they are not divided, e.g. most of CA 74 from San Juan Capistrano at least to Lake Elsinore. Could you explain your reasoning?

Reverted SEO spam that is mistagged and misplaced.

You turned links between two driveways and La Pata into trunk_link (for the Riding Park and for Gateway Place). Do me, they do not meet the description of a "sliproad / ramp", but rather simply a place where a driveway meets a major road.

Why did you do this? I'd suggest turning them back into driveways, with the possible exceptions of the left turn lane into Gateway Place and the left turn lane from the Riding Park onto La Pata.

Reverted because it renamed a road after a business.

Reverted because this changed a section of road into a business.

I've reverted this changeset because it appears clearly to make fictional edits.

When making changes to our shared map, please stick with what's real.

I've deleted the fantasy object added in this changeset.

I've deleted the acknowledged fake object added in this changeset.

I've deleted the acknowledged fake object added in this changeset.

I've deleted the acknowledged fake object added in this changeset.

It looks like this changeset mostly removed gnis:*, import_uuid, and is_in tags from a lot of towns, cities, etc. What's the reasoning for doing this?

This edit is incorrect. It's based on Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta and Bing Roadside, which are both outdated in this case. There is new building where these (older) roads were re-drawn. Preferably you would have noticed that the building was drawn here and looked more carefully at other imagery before commiting your change, instead of re-drawing out of date roads over the building. Reverting.

Reverted because a highway's name was changed into that of a business.

Reverted because this changed a highway into a business.

Deleted because this appears to duplicate an existing adjacent node.