OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
107993779 over 4 years ago

I've extracted all merchants based on iD warnings. If you feel like it is an error, please revert.

changeset/111203875#map=19/39.33555/-76.63047

85964609 over 4 years ago

Seriously speaking, you should check your own data before importing them.

I really wish to delete all your previous imports and then draw the water on my own, because there are too many dated data were added with offset issues.

110769754 over 4 years ago

Please check node/158395844#map=19/39.69508/-79.15114

57815042 over 4 years ago

When there is no physical barrier, it should not be mapped as a separate way.

way/576465500#map=19/39.45617/-76.29883

110736536 over 4 years ago

May I ask for the reason drawing the road area here?

way/979743815#map=19/40.02540/-76.53229

83559966 over 4 years ago

I've removed this stop sign because there is no such thing. You only need to stop when pedestrians are present, but that's common sense.

node/7403911083

78946560 over 4 years ago

I don't think the Meadow Park has such a detailed boundary along Big Elk Crk and I've removed them.

98867606 over 4 years ago

Please ensure to enable relevant layer while mapping. You added a duplicate of way/61339194 as way/904857590.

Moreover, avoid using dated sources to map Maryland.

105517807 over 4 years ago

Would you please check way/948324225/? Is it an invalid data?

89777871 over 4 years ago

Please do not reinvent an existing landuse feature for logistic grounds.

landuse=commercial

64746292 over 4 years ago

I don't have any issue with anyone. What I originally wrote was pretty simple: How about...?

It is your choice to "yes/no/whatever". I cannot do anything for you. Checking the source is very important because it not only reduces errors but also saves time of everyone else.

Let's stop this conversation here.

64746292 over 4 years ago

You cannot win this time.

How about verifying the building I mentioned there and see who is correct? It is still "in" the ESRI clarity, why not adding back if I'm wrong?

3 years ago you added something from 10 years ago, that does not sound OK to justify your local knowledge, right?

110806812 over 4 years ago

Yes they are really cosmetic.

What I’ve done is adding the full name of the garage and drop TIGER tags of 2 streets after aligning them.

104825478 over 4 years ago

Please avoid attaching any park area with road segments.

87727326 over 4 years ago

How about learning road type first?

You created a mess here, literally make the data unusable.

way/824297022#map=19/39.92517/-77.61639

99937607 over 4 years ago

There is no reason to add a segment to the parking lot when it is alongside the road.

way/910660632

Also do not use Bing to edit Pennsylvania.

66582004 over 4 years ago

PEMA imagery has been added to the OSM. Please take a look with your previous edits to see if there is any offset.

osm.org/#map=19/39.93948/-77.62645

52021449 over 4 years ago

osm.wiki/Naming_conventions

64746292 over 4 years ago

How about not importing garbages? The building you added has been demolished probably since 10 years ago.

way/647432578

72653995 over 4 years ago

The entire area, which you added using Mapbox, has offset issue.