DUGA's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 107993779 | over 4 years ago | I've extracted all merchants based on iD warnings. If you feel like it is an error, please revert. |
| 85964609 | over 4 years ago | Seriously speaking, you should check your own data before importing them. I really wish to delete all your previous imports and then draw the water on my own, because there are too many dated data were added with offset issues. |
| 110769754 | over 4 years ago | Please check node/158395844#map=19/39.69508/-79.15114 |
| 57815042 | over 4 years ago | When there is no physical barrier, it should not be mapped as a separate way. |
| 110736536 | over 4 years ago | May I ask for the reason drawing the road area here? |
| 83559966 | over 4 years ago | I've removed this stop sign because there is no such thing. You only need to stop when pedestrians are present, but that's common sense. |
| 78946560 | over 4 years ago | I don't think the Meadow Park has such a detailed boundary along Big Elk Crk and I've removed them. |
| 98867606 | over 4 years ago | Please ensure to enable relevant layer while mapping. You added a duplicate of way/61339194 as way/904857590. Moreover, avoid using dated sources to map Maryland. |
| 105517807 | over 4 years ago | Would you please check way/948324225/? Is it an invalid data? |
| 89777871 | over 4 years ago | Please do not reinvent an existing landuse feature for logistic grounds. |
| 64746292 | over 4 years ago | I don't have any issue with anyone. What I originally wrote was pretty simple: How about...? It is your choice to "yes/no/whatever". I cannot do anything for you. Checking the source is very important because it not only reduces errors but also saves time of everyone else. Let's stop this conversation here. |
| 64746292 | over 4 years ago | You cannot win this time. How about verifying the building I mentioned there and see who is correct? It is still "in" the ESRI clarity, why not adding back if I'm wrong? 3 years ago you added something from 10 years ago, that does not sound OK to justify your local knowledge, right? |
| 110806812 | over 4 years ago | Yes they are really cosmetic. What I’ve done is adding the full name of the garage and drop TIGER tags of 2 streets after aligning them. |
| 104825478 | over 4 years ago | Please avoid attaching any park area with road segments. |
| 87727326 | over 4 years ago | How about learning road type first? You created a mess here, literally make the data unusable. |
| 99937607 | over 4 years ago | There is no reason to add a segment to the parking lot when it is alongside the road. Also do not use Bing to edit Pennsylvania. |
| 66582004 | over 4 years ago | PEMA imagery has been added to the OSM. Please take a look with your previous edits to see if there is any offset. |
| 52021449 | over 4 years ago | |
| 64746292 | over 4 years ago | How about not importing garbages? The building you added has been demolished probably since 10 years ago. |
| 72653995 | over 4 years ago | The entire area, which you added using Mapbox, has offset issue. |