DUGA's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 118674150 | over 3 years ago | I don’t map for renderer. Cosmetic changes means minor changes, surface level changes. It has nothing to do with renderer. In fact, all the time I use OSM on my phone is via Go Map. You are welcome to find a good topic here so I can see what was mapped wrong here. |
| 119222644 | over 3 years ago | Excuse me? What is the turning circle here??? It is a pedestrian area. |
| 112238152 | over 3 years ago | Not a bridge at all. |
| 118852955 | over 3 years ago | Hi Yuliya, Thank you for the reply. Actually turn restrictions are marked on the ground, because the road is one way, you cannot make a left turn from the parking lot. No U turn is not something I noticed to be missing (yes normally no one will do this in such a small area), however when you map it, you not only map for cars, you also need to think about trucks. I appreciate your effort on this though. In my opinion, barriers like these become just tiny indicators of no left turn (because of one way), and that’s why I have the opinion of not mapping in details. |
| 112758572 | over 3 years ago | Better put a node on the road with gate tagged instead of this. It does not make much sense and data just cannot be consumed. |
| 118869614 | over 3 years ago | Seriously? way/390840823#map=18/33.88227/-84.29170 This building is not just for CDC. |
| 118852955 | over 3 years ago | What you may consider doing is adding proper turn restrictions here rather than mapping a bunch of Ys. |
| 110907890 | over 3 years ago | My suggestion is to not map them: way/980864007#map=19/39.19705/-76.61319 Adding bunch of roads underneath the roof sounds cool, but your GPS will not always work as expected. |
| 76542796 | almost 4 years ago | Would you please use a computer to carefully check your edits? Do you believe that a fire hydrant can be found at this place? |
| 90383701 | almost 4 years ago | Your edit has been partially reverted. Please do not mess with traffic engineering, and your edits in Pennsylvania will be closely watched. |
| 97064778 | almost 4 years ago | Your edits have been partially reverted because they do not follow OSM mapping standard. No worry I've updated this course with a lot of details. Please note that in US by default the path within the golf resort should be "Golf Cartpath" but not "Golf Walking Path". |
| 43827285 | almost 4 years ago | No no no I'm not complaining here. I'm just trying to understand why there were used. Thank you for pointing out the crux, guess the history is buggy and I did not notice that. |
| 43827285 | almost 4 years ago | way/149177532/history#map=17/39.81688/-79.03598 PennDOT uses SR for all state routes, PA 2004 should not be used. reg_name is a very weird tag and I have never heard of this in Pennsylvania. For SR, one just needs to tag ref:penndot and the name in the local GIS/street sign. When out of Boro, the road may be named as "Route XX"/"State Hwy XX" because they are the official names used for parcels. Never saw "Pennsylvania Route 2004" anywhere. |
| 74868418 | almost 4 years ago | Please do not intersect areas with road. Road has its own area, right now OSM does not map road as area, but it also does not mean the hospital owns that part. |
| 86213045 | almost 4 years ago | No such building |
| 117545156 | almost 4 years ago | Actually no. I have to admit that in the past I did not add it. However, if oneway=no and lanes=2, at least our data consumers will be able to tell that it is 1 forward and 1 backward. So adding it may be helpful. I usually add this tag when a road is being cleaned up, and I do not spam changesets on this at this moment. |
| 39730148 | almost 4 years ago | Unfortunately this is wrong. The no right turn is for a dead end alley right before the intersection. |
| 117499304 | almost 4 years ago | Where do you live sir? I’m a local and I never saw anything there. They were wrongly added. You are not welcome to add something currently not there at OSM, if you wish to add railways in the past, go to https://openhistoricalmap.org/. Fail to do so will result in a block to your account. |
| 86019925 | almost 4 years ago | Your edit of annexing the road segment as the boundary/verge of the woods may need to be fully reverted. It not only increases the workload of others, but also because there is "road area". When drawing woods, you need to avoid overlapping with road area. |
| 58121373 | almost 4 years ago | Part of your contribution of the abandoned railroad has been deleted at where it no longer exists. way/580263651#map=14/40.4057/-77.2191 Please do not add them back. If you wish to add such kind of features, go to https://openhistoricalmap.org/ |