What? New aerial? Where? =D
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175593721

Nice, but why this changeset on top of the previous one? Seemed ok before that...

Hi, could you draw the outline of this solar station (generator:source=solar), at least an approximate one?

Hi,
this sidewalk was already marked with sidewalk tags on the roads way/1291343766, way/1001384486 and way/23612173.

Oh, wow, thanks for the explanation!
I didn't know that this is not a strict rule, more like a rule of thumb. I would guess that the decision to downgrade the classification was made based on the surface. And the proposed classification would be reserved for the case this road gets asphalted and the northern connection to V673 finished. The current state now appears valid to me, unfortunately, not able to verify it onsite.

Following similar logic, that one short part of V694 (or even completely) to the west could be downgraded to highway=tertiary. I was, again, thinking of this as a strict rule with changeset/151454473

Hi,
I also don't get the motivation for the tag changes done by the previous changeset changeset/112092128. According to osm.wiki/Lv:Latvian_tagging_guidelines, the P-roads should be highway=primary, exactly how this highway was tagged initially.
The reference code remains P66, so there wasn't any official highway category downgrade. So I think, it should be fixed back to highway=primary.

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Unfortunately, Google Street View is not allowed as a data source here, see osm.wiki/Google. You are welcome to use the alternative street-level imagery sources like Mapillary (or KartaView, Mapilio etc., see Map Data toolbar in iD editor). These services allow to upload own recordings that can later be safely used for OSM mapping.
In addition, local knowledge of the current situation and, especially, checking the situation on-site remain as reliable sources of information.
Happy mapping,
Cucazer

Čau! Vai way/1331445061, way/1331445062 un pārējie nav būtu landuse=grass un tad viens kopīgs leisure=park apkārt (ja to vispār var skaitīt par parku)? Citādi kaut kā neloģiski sanāk, ka vienā vietā ir 6 dažādi mazi parciņi...
Savukārt way/129399051 tika pārtegots uz highway=residential, tikmēr visi pārējie ceļi apkārt ir highway=living_street. Nedomāju, ka dzīvojama zona tiek pārktraukta uz šo mazo gabaliņu.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158829321

Hi, there's still node/7815115383 - double tagging?

Found the reference: https://osgeo-oceania.org/2023/07/18/qgis-training/
Also see way/1302388583 and surroundings

Thanks!
So you mean that some of the cutlines are not usable as track/path? I guess, it's not confidently identifiable just from the aerial imagery.

Hello, what was the intention for restoring leisure=swimming_pool tags, while having the same with abandoned:?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153476252

Hello, I'm not sure about the northern edge. Digital terrain imagery suggests that there is some water level 20-50 meters further out. Or is it now just a muddy reedbed with no constant water level? I'm not much familiar with this side of the lake though...
Nevertheless it's an improvement from the previous version!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153397008

Additional source: https://www.ievp.gov.lv/lv/strukturvieniba/daugavgrivas-cietums

Hello!
This changeset created a bunch of multipolygons (e.g. relation/17605455, relation/17605456) for the objects that were already marked as simple polygons. These didn't have any unusual geometries (as in osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Examples_in_XML) to justify use of multipolygons. In this scenario converting simple ways to relations with many members just complicates further editing, as the features cannot be that easily separated.
What are your intentions with converting simple polygons to multipolygons?

The new track way/1272534387 got connected to landuse contours. This does not make much sense and better to leave the end unconnected or terminate it with a gate or turning circle.

Ooh, I've always stumbled upon these points and wondered whether these really belong here. Thanks for addressing my concerns!
Btw, that knotted area in the middle is some kind of MTB park with trails and jumps, as I remember it from more than 10 years ago.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146282395

Yes, this changeset is related to that note, thank you for linking

Ah, damn, dachte, man kann die ruhig löschen, wenn schon auf irgendwelchem Luftbild die nicht mehr sichtbar sind. Auf NRW Ortophoto sind die einfach weg, auf iDOP habe ich den neuen Umriss gefunden. Und bei Liegenschaftskataster ist das neue Gebäude schon da, aber noch als "geplant".

Man kann das Changeset dann ruhig reverten - habe (halbabsichtlich) nicht viel außerdem gemacht, ist schnell wiederholbar.

Danke fürs Reviewen!

Weitere Details wie Gebäude, Wege, Pfade und andere Details müssen noch surveyed werden...