ConnorWong's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 121395053 | Hi peace2, I would change relation/7417118 to a boundary relation and create a new one for the landuse. Best wishes |
|
| 121028414 | Hi Someone Else, node/9742244789 is interestingly solitaire. |
|
| 121309534 | Please don't slurp buildings into OSM with such a bad quality: way/1062541097/history |
|
| 118741480 | Please use more specific changeset comments, especially for such a large editing window. |
|
| 102843237 | highway=primary is too high for this road |
|
| 82074053 | "by more experienced editors" must be a joke: Timothy Smith has once been blocked for blindly and wrongly applying autovalidator changes: osm.org/user_blocks/3277 |
|
| 121374533 | Dear Mondal, probably you were encouraged to only use changeset comments. Please read https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2021-April/086458.html |
|
| 115961825 | Hi Mark, do you know the gauge of these tracks? |
|
| 119370020 | Why are you adding tidal=no to a mountain lake? |
|
| 113735189 | Hi Memoire, I would only map streams with "final precision", so they don't need to be touched ever again. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=113735189 Kind regards |
|
| 121155010 | Hi btwhite, does way/10584196/history "absolutely" not exist, or is it just not permissible to walk there? |
|
| 117205424 | Please keep your changeset window small. |
|
| 121260637 | ||
| 121221064 | Honorable Dwangchuk, please use verbose, self-explaining changeset comments instead of a generic phrase like "updated": osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
|
| 121212066 | Is this a joke? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=121212066 |
|
| 121211373 | If Microsoft produces footprints like way/1061867263 – shall we really import them? |
|
| 121199773 | Where is way/1049853806/history gone? |
|
| 121164708 | Please check way/1061528829 |
|
| 118358380 | Check your "streets": https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=121035447 |
|
| 121040192 | U are troll. |