OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
97231709

Hi Andy,

the "paradox of tolerance" cannot applied on this case.

Your premise based on "official" information. If this was the case, countries should only be have an "official_name:*" without any "name:*" tag.

The name:fr "Allemagne" is the accepted name of the majority of French speakers. So it is an information which could be added to OSM. If we have a further look to other languages which significantly less speakers, like Lojban. The relation #51477 have a name in this language ("name:jbo"), which is accepted. Where do you draw the line? Klingon have speakers like Lojban, Lojban and Klingon are both constructed languages, there is an accepted name in Klingon for Germany, like in Lojban. So were is difference?
name:tlh=DoyIchlan is real existing information of Germany. It is "fictional" like any other name. Languages are always a human construct.

> In the case of OSM, the problem with adding _fictional_ data is that it devalues the _factual_ data already here.
Let's take your argument further, you devalued the work of Marc Okrand compared to James Cooke Brown.

On the last point, which shows that your changes have no basis whatsoever. The tag "name:tlh" was not my idea. The tag was already in use and is still in use, please check https://taginfo.osm.org/keys/name%3Atlh#overview. What were the requirements to get in this check-up process? I miss this discussion on other changesets like changeset/116850726 and changeset/107736434.

Best regards,
Chriss

78793145

Hi MonteAlbert,

thanks for your scrutinizing view.
I change my workflows to split those changes in sets which are group by cities or regions, but in any case by countries.

Greetings,
Chriss

52240901

Hi Polarbear,

no I changed the syntax of the tag "opening_hours" not by checking the information itself. (syntax no content)
The change was part of a project to develop a AI assistant and we used the harmonized data as a base.

With a few years of distance and more experience I developed another view on this and would do this type of change in this way. So if you found any issues, please feel free to change it without consideration of this changeset.

Best regards,
Chriss

78993546

Hi Andy,

this change is not directly connected the the reason of this changeset. But it was a simple correction, which I included in the complete process.
I removed the tag "direction=down", because it duplicates the information of "incline=down", which is the accepted schema.

Best regards,
Chriss

86355750

Hi maro21,

thanks for the information.
I changed my workflows to split those changes in sets which are group by cities or regions, but in any case by countries.

Greetings,
Chriss

93990928

Hi aquarix,

thanks for your attention.
I changed my workflows to split those changes in sets which are group by cities or regions, but in any case by countries.

Best regards,
Chriss

97109261

Hi Amegaz,

thanks for your vision.
I changed my workflows to split those changes in sets which are group by cities or regions, but in any case by countries.

Best regards
Chriss

110103772

Hi zluuzki,

thanks for this information. I change my workflows to split those changes in sets which are group by cities or regions, but in any case by countries.

Greetings
Chriss

114301370

You're welcome @JeroenHoek

115050465

Which kind of Copy & Paste issue do you mean?

114437507

You're welcome @markbegbie

158140433

Thanks.

See comments in changeset #55174451: changeset/55174451

55174451

Fixed in changeset #158140433: changeset/158140433

117126631

You're welcome @philippec

157805809

You're welcome @Supaplex

160600374

You're welcome @queenofthenightosphere

158028190

Da du wesentlich näher dran bist als ich vertraue ich dir da voll und ganz. Ich sehe da zumindest jetzt nichts, was für mich eindeutig falsch oder ungenau wäre. Danke dir.

90664361

Danke dir @chris66

way/845835004 changed in changeset/160860894

118427022

Hello woodpeck,

sorry that your tools not working with this information. But if you think a node is "enough" we could map every polygon as nodes. Like countries, cities or lakes.
A node only tells you that at this exact coordinates are a feature but not how big it is or where it ends.

So if I get the information of node/305640277 how could an algorithm tell me if at 54°56'27.2"N, 13°35'42.1"E is the Baltic Sea or which water I look at https://tile.osm.org/19/283093/167450.png

I don't know that OpenStreetMap is a website to draw geometric features. I always thought it is a database, which includes worldwide geometric information and not only a list of coordinates like wikidata.

Greetings
Chriss

127404610

Updated in changeset/128430826

Thanks @cyton