Hello razor74, thank you for the information.

Hi, swapping the classifications makes sense to me. I didn't see any documentation if the new way was intended to be ruta 21 or not, so for now I left the urban ways as they were.

I now see it is not a divided lane, I will updated the geometry and and map it as a turn lane

Thanks for noticing this, I corrected the tag and updated the destination as seen in Mapillary

Hello, I listed my sources in my changset comment, but it appears I misjudged this and see a full length stop line, I will add this one way tag back

Hello, I listed my sources in my changset comment where I observed cars parked bi-directionally and a stop line

Hello, I listed my sources in my changset comment where I observed cars parked bi-directionally

Hello, I listed my sources in my changset comment where I observed cars parked bi-directionally

Hello, I listed my sources in my changset comment where I observed cars traveling bi-directionally

Hello, I listed my source in my changset comment where I observed cars parked bi-directionally

Hello, I listed my sources in my changset comment where I observed cars parked bi-directionally and a stop line

Hello, I listed my sources in my changset comment where I observed cars parked bi-directionally

No problem, mweper. There were many cases of junction=roundabout flagged in the validator, which is how I found this one, and there are many more I haven't looked into yet. Thanks for the collaboration. -CapAhab

Hi carciofo, in this changeset I opened the new bridge and added nearby roundabouts. I carried over the ref data as I saw it added by BigKev97. In the past my ref edits have been to fix gaps on bridges and similar. I have seen the use of two ref tags on the same way to connect highway routes, but have not seen this on the ground and would suspect it is not signed this way.

Thank you for this information. I will keep routes as tertiary if leading to less than 2,000 and downgrade a portion of secondary to tertiary on RP63