Buraddo's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 177735373 | We know that rarad74 is enforcing the living_street tagging in the region where he's most active (Bucharest area). As far as we've discussed in the community, the general consensus is to use the more internationally-aligned service road, but also follow local rules if the area is using a different scheme. |
|
| 178081403 | Salut,
Când am trecut prin zonă părea că era închisă cu plasă de sârmă. Am greșit ștergând-o? |
|
| 177735373 | Hello lampronessa, I observed that in this changeset that you reclassified a lot of former service roads in Giroc to living_streets. This change sparked a discussion inside the Romanian OSM community Telegram group (https://t.me/OSMRomania/20212) and the common opinion was that living_street is not the correct tag for this situation. "A living street or residential street is a street designed with the interests of pedestrians and cyclists in mind" ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_street highway=living_street ). We believe that we should only tag streets as living_street only the streets that are designed, marked and enforced as a street with pedestrian priority. This is usually seen by the use of the traffic sign "Zonă rezidențială" which limits the vehicular speeds to 20km/h and enforces priority for pedestrians. What we see in Giroc new developments are former rural plots that were divided in multiple lots where houses or medium-density apartment buildings were build with a common access road to the main street. On those access roads, even if we see that pedestrians use the main carriageway (as they are often build without proper separation and/or sidewalks), their main purpose is still for vehicular access to the buildings. Thus, we think that the correct tag for them is highway=service (The highway=service tag denotes ways used for vehicle access to a building, parking lot, service station, business estate, beach, campsite, etc. - highway=service ). If you agree with our designations, I can help on retagging to mitigating the issue and you can join us on the telegram group for further discussions. Thanks. |
|
| 175596239 | Thanks, it looks good, you can keep one way or do another separation at the entrance, however you like.
|
|
| 175596239 | Hello,
|
|
| 173844518 | Hello,
|
|
| 173843795 | Please don't use the name tag for descriptions, it should be used only for proper names |
|
| 173844526 | the name tag should be used only for proper names, not for descriptions
|
|
| 173844032 | Hello,
|
|
| 173888497 | Hello,
|
|
| 173888315 | Hello,
|
|
| 173888268 | Btw, there is a fork of the default editor which uses AI to draw buildings, you can give this tool to your class and make a much faster job: rapideditor.org |
|
| 173888268 | Hello,
|
|
| 173888267 | Hello,
|
|
| 173093048 | Footway bridge has been demolished in July. It was also removed from the map at that point. I reverted this changeset. |
|
| 172453816 | Don't add fake informations! |
|
| 169975373 | Thanks for the response.
I reverted your changeset in 170093204 |
|
| 169975373 | Intersection has been changed during latesst weekend as construction progressed. Why did you delete the new intersection and remap the old one? |
|
| 168281109 | Hello,
|
|
| 167476230 | De ce ai șters tagurile de pe poligonul de landuse? S-a invalidat o porțiune uriașă de farmland ca urmare. |