It is a place where you pay to go and paint pottery that you get to take home. I don't know the correct tagging. Somewhat like a "paint and sip" place.

With the Cleopatra Hotel, the change that I made was to create two features: one for the building itself and one for the amenity that is currently set up inside. This distinction is understood in OSM, see the second paragraph of osm.wiki/Key:building.

The *building* is heritage listed feature (described by the linked wikidata entry) and has the name "Cleopatra Hotel".
The *community center* inside the building has the same address, but a different name.

Often we use the same OSM area element to tag both a building and the amenity inside it. This is a shortcut that not applicable here, because the building and amenity have different names, wikidata ID's etc.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146467939

Hi Charles,

I just wanted to mention that the `name` tag is only for the *proper noun* name for things, not for a description or generic term. See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only and the "Names are not for descriptions" section below that.

If there is information that can't be captured in tags that you know of, you can add a description in the `note` tag for other mappers to look at, or the `description` tag for map users to see.

Keep it up!
Ben

Hi Rebecca.

I've been looking over the edits from our day out. I love the details that you have included in the features that you added!

One thing that I do want to point out though is that the `name` tag is only for the *proper noun* name for things, not for a description or generic term. See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only and the "Names are not for descriptions" section below that.

I hope to spot more of your edits around in the wild in the future!

Cheers, Ben.

Based on the imagery and City of Busselton website, I think Ambergate Reserve is better described by `leisure=nature_reserve`, so I have gone ahead and re-tagged it.

The tag `water=level groundwater related` - as it is not a standard value - would probably be better served by some sort of `note=` tag as a way to inform future mappers, or a `description=` tag for map consumers.

In my view, your recent edits across a range of feature types have been very accurate and show a great understanding of how the tagging system should be used. Keep it up!

Yes, I've used "cement" and "concrete" interchangeably, and the correct tag is "concrete".

I have been corrected, it is clearly "The Peanut Roundabout".

Nice work on the ramp!

It looks like Vespucci didn't agree with the ramp behind Bossman and the indoor footpath (?) through that building.

Also, highway=footway is preferred over highway=path for paved paths. `path` is less specific than `footway`, so I only use it for tracks through the bush and desire paths over grass and stuff.

The kerb shouldn't go on a path that it doesn't interrupt (the sidewalk). The kerb should go where the kerb would intersect the crossing. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=119062309
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118684680

Thanks! I'm trying to see if it is at all possible to avoid retracing, because the overlapping areas are a pain to work with.

I think the geofabrik self intersection error is to do with the building:part=yes crossing over nodes without including them. Does my latest change [1] work? Hopefully multipolygons support adjacent regions like this.

The seating area is on a deck (slightly raised floor level, no roof). Adding building:part is appropriate, so I went with 'deck'.

1: osm.org/changeset/114081043

You have mistakenly used the tag ford=yes outside the geography building. A ford is a place where water flows over a path. This intersection between two footpaths doesn't need any tag at all.

osm.org/node/9247537174
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113720530

Great edits around UWA! A small details: benches (and any feature that is not a part of the path itself) should not be attached to the footway.

You can use right click -> "Extract" in the editor to place the bench next to the footway.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113719988

The name tag is specifically for proper names that are visible on the ground, or widely understood. Unless there is a plaque or something labelling this tree "Old Jarrah Tree" the name tag is not appropriate here.

General information that doesn't fit in other tags can go in the description tag if it is applicable for the map user, or the note tag if it is for other mappers (or the fixme tag if it is problem that needs addressing).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113719886

We were talking about the gravel area[1] that JOSM was complaining about and I've done some thinking. From a routing perspective, the area should be treated as a footway, which tells us that highway=footway is the correct tag. The wiki[2] confirms that the tag can be used on an area (in the box on the right). So in this case, I would add highway=footway.

[1]: osm.org/way/1001966384
[2]: osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113721383

Nice additions!

I spotted that you accidentally moved the war memorial osm.org/node/7108686714 half way across the suburb.

Also, you can press Q (the "Square" tool) to square the edges of buildings or a group bunch of buildings, or to make a corner square.

I like seeing your updates across Subi!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113265941

It looks like this changeset accidentally added bus related tags to this residential area: osm.org/way/309968317

I will leave you with the opportunity to untangle your original intention out of it :)

source=survey

source=local-knowledge