To avoid remaking objects, look at the "Split" tool in any editor, where you can split an object into two segments which might make your mapping easier.

Also, the main reason why we don't retrace things is because of the OSM principle "Keep the History" osm.wiki/Keep_the_history.

Avoid connecting roadways to landuse or boundaries. Also, make sure that when you are updating something, like a road, that any other objects that made have changed are updated to. So for example, there was a trailhead parking lot (way/855741080) that now is gone because of the construction, and thus should be removed. I've updated these in changeset/182274121.

Yeah don't map turn lanes separately unless there is a physical barrier. To map turn lanes, refer to the wiki osm.wiki/Lanes.

and https://resreg.spl.usace.army.mil/pages/ttmm.php

Hi Roads_AZ44>,

I'm reverting this changeset as you essentially just retraced this road, deleting important lane, maxspeed, and surface tags. I see you did fix how the road connects to La Canada, thank you. Keep mapping!

Thanks,
BubbaJuice

Thanks, I wasn't aware that Tucson deployed Motorola but I saw one just the other day. They've deployed a lot of ALPRs, many still unmapped.

Hello,
The building you added here does not exist. Please check the buildings you are importing carefully. way/1477858554

Thank you,
BubbaJuice

Despite this, I feel like physical construction is still an important part of road classification. Route 210 & Alvernon feature several grade separated interchanges in my opinion.

Hi muvuvia,

Are you sure you are tagging a Motorola Camera? What streetlevel imagery are you using? I don't see anything on Bing Streetside or any other open street imageries. I also don't see anything on Google Maps either... Let me know.

Thanks,
BubbaJuice

https://www.doi.gov/pressreleases/biden-harris-administration-announces-nearly-6-million-innovative-solar-panel

Also used USGS Topo Map layer.

This is not confusing and it represents the nature on the ground. There is a median on the road and as such the map should reflect that. I will be changing this back.

The reason these roads were marked not as oneway=yes is because there is no outlet. Police have used this to turn around or monitor speed. I will be changing the tagging to oneway=no for this reason.

Yes, a ford would be correct. I went ahead and just fixed it. Thank you.

Please be more careful when adding waterway culverts. There is not a culvert here. way/785484113/history/3

What's the source for this name? Thanks

4 years ago me and another mapper made these trunk based on traffic numbers. See changeset/109601263 & https://pag.public.ms2soft.com/tcds/tsearch.asp. These roads are built up because they carry a large amount of cars. In our proposal, these were made trunk to distinguish between major arterials (tagged as primary) and these high-capacity, built up roads. I'm hoping we can shift these back to trunk but I'm open to discussion.

Thanks,
BubbaJuice

4 years ago me and another mapper made these trunk based on traffic numbers. See changeset/109601263 & https://pag.public.ms2soft.com/tcds/tsearch.asp. These roads are built up because they carry a large amount of cars. In our proposal, these were made trunk to distinguish between major arterials (tagged as primary) and these high-capacity, built up roads. I'm hoping we can shift these back to trunk but I'm open to discussion.

Thanks,
BubbaJuice

Was this discussed? thanks

Please don't remove operators and names such as you did here. relation/19787483/history#map=18/32.502089/-111.294909

Thanks