Hi muvuvia,

Are you sure you are tagging a Motorola Camera? What streetlevel imagery are you using? I don't see anything on Bing Streetside or any other open street imageries. I also don't see anything on Google Maps either... Let me know.

Thanks,
BubbaJuice

https://www.doi.gov/pressreleases/biden-harris-administration-announces-nearly-6-million-innovative-solar-panel

Also used USGS Topo Map layer.

This is not confusing and it represents the nature on the ground. There is a median on the road and as such the map should reflect that. I will be changing this back.

The reason these roads were marked not as oneway=yes is because there is no outlet. Police have used this to turn around or monitor speed. I will be changing the tagging to oneway=no for this reason.

Yes, a ford would be correct. I went ahead and just fixed it. Thank you.

Please be more careful when adding waterway culverts. There is not a culvert here. way/785484113/history/3

What's the source for this name? Thanks

4 years ago me and another mapper made these trunk based on traffic numbers. See changeset/109601263 & https://pag.public.ms2soft.com/tcds/tsearch.asp. These roads are built up because they carry a large amount of cars. In our proposal, these were made trunk to distinguish between major arterials (tagged as primary) and these high-capacity, built up roads. I'm hoping we can shift these back to trunk but I'm open to discussion.

Thanks,
BubbaJuice

4 years ago me and another mapper made these trunk based on traffic numbers. See changeset/109601263 & https://pag.public.ms2soft.com/tcds/tsearch.asp. These roads are built up because they carry a large amount of cars. In our proposal, these were made trunk to distinguish between major arterials (tagged as primary) and these high-capacity, built up roads. I'm hoping we can shift these back to trunk but I'm open to discussion.

Thanks,
BubbaJuice

Was this discussed? thanks

Please don't remove operators and names such as you did here. relation/19787483/history#map=18/32.502089/-111.294909

Thanks

Also source=https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/a695e1dbdeab4e8ba5c6ad4fd06a0ba0; https://arizona-content.usedirect.com/storage/20241107094817lodu_park-map.pdf

Also source=https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/a695e1dbdeab4e8ba5c6ad4fd06a0ba0; https://arizona-content.usedirect.com/storage/20241107094817lodu_park-map.pdf

source=https://docs.tep.com/wp-content/uploads/2023-TEP-IRP.pdf

And https://www.oasis.oati.com/PPW/PPWdocs/Attachment_K___Q3_Public_Meeting__091114.pdf

& https://www.uesaz.com/rio-rico-to-harshaw/ for voltages

Also used EIA 860-2024 early release for generator capacities and start dates

Also some voltages here: https://ssvec.org/downloads/inserts/2018/August-2018-Special.pdf

Also please use JOSM when editing such large areas. iD does not have a verification capacity to make sure you are uploading quality data.