Correction: Source used was Bing aerial imagery

Correction: Source used was Mapbox Satellite

Correction: Source used was Bing aerial imagery

Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; Já 360

Correction: Source used was Bing aerial imagery.

Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery (Clarity); Mapillary

Correction: Source used was Maxar Premium Imagery; Mapillary

Correction: Source used was Kartaview

Correction: Source used was Maxar Premium Imagery, Staðfangaskrá

Correction: Source used was Maxar Premium Imagery, Staðfangaskrá

Correction: Source used was Maxar Premium Imagery

Correction: Source used was SDFE; Mapillary

Correction: Source used was SDFE.

Correction: Also used Mapillary

Hello Panchito_de_GDL, Thanks for mapping! I am confused why you have reclassified way/950203398 to “highway=motorway,” along with portions of all the connecting ways around this circular junction. According to the OSM Wiki page regarding motorways (highway=motorway), that highway classification is reserved for highways with controlled access. By definition, an at-grade junction such as this is not controlled access, and "highway=trunk" seems to be the most appropriate classification. Is there a particular reason why you reclassified these highway segments as you did?

I am also curious if you know the proper "junction" tag for this feature. Without ground-level imagery, I am not certain if it is best represented as "junction=circular" (junction=circular) or "junction=roundabout" (junction=roundabout). Do you know which tag would be better for way/950203398? Regardless of which is more appropriate, both policy pages confirm the connecting highway classifications should remain consistent leading up to the junction, such as those modeled nearby (way/260508527). The “highway=motorway”segments extending south and east of the junction seem inappropriate.

Thanks, and let me know if you have any questions!

Hola Panchito_de_GDL, ¡Gracias por mapear! No estoy seguro de por qué ha reclasificado way/950203398 como "highway=motorway", junto con partes de todas las vías de conexión alrededor de este cruce circular. De acuerdo con la página Wiki de OSM sobre autopistas (highway=motorway), esa clasificación de autopistas está reservada para autopistas con acceso controlado. Por definición, un cruce a-nivel como este no es uno de acceso controlado, y "highway=trunk" parece ser la clasificación más apropiada. ¿Hay alguna razón en particular por la que reclasificó estos segmentos de carretera como lo hizo?

También tengo curiosidad si conoce la etiqueta de "cruce" adecuada para este rasgo. Sin imágenes a nivel del suelo, no estoy seguro de si se representa mejor como "cruce=circular" (junction=circular) o "cruce=rotonda" (https:/ /wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout). ¿Sabe qué etiqueta sería mejor para way/950203398? Independientemente de cuál sea más apropiado, ambas páginas de políticas confirman que las clasificaciones de carreteras de conexión deben permanecer consistentes antes del cruce, como las que se modelan cerca (way/260508527). Los segmentos de “carretera=autopista” que se extienden al sur y al este del cruce parecen inapropiados.

Gracias, y avísame si tienes alguna pregunta.

Correction: Source used was Maxar Premium Imagery.

Updated trunk_link for the Объездная улица #adt
Source: Maxar Premium Imagery, Yandex Panorama

Also used Yandex Panorama as source

Also used Mapillary

Hello Miguel, I realigned the roads to Esri World Imagery since it’s the newer imagery and appears to be closer aligned to Strava and GPS data. Thanks!