Hello wiessen,
Welcome and thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. In this changeset, I observed that you have tried mapped trees with a circle way and tagged it as natural:wood. But, generally a node(point) with `natural=tree` is used to denote a tree in OpenStreetMap conventionally. Refer this wiki guide: natural=tree

Please read through the available wikis on how to map and tag features for more details.
Would be great if you can fix these and correct them.

Hello dmgroom_ct,
In this edit, I noticed that you have changed a tag of the relation from coastline to wood.relation/1236607
But as seen on satellite imageries, I see a water body in the region. Hope this was an accidental change. Also `natural=coastline` is usually tagged on ways and not on multi-polygon relations.
Ref: osm.wiki/Coastline

And hence changing the tags of relation to `natural=water`. Please be careful during your further edits. Also, feel free to suggest if you have other thoughts on this.

Thank you

Hello PlannerHinton,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution. In this edit, it was observed that you have merged a `place=town` and a monument on a single node. The good practice is to have two separate nodes to specific types of features. Changing back to the old state. Please be careful during your further edits. Refer to OSM wiki at osm.wiki/ to know more about best practices in OpenStreetMap.
Thank you.

Hello kirkuk83,
Welcome and thank you for your contributions to OpenSteetMap. In this edit, I observed that you have modified trunk roads and tagged it as motorways. What was the source? Is this based on your local knowledge or is there any verifiable source for this? Is yes, could you please share ?
Thank you.

Fixed the issue. Here is the corrected changeset. changeset/48785273

Hello manuelab_telenav,

I checked out the Mapillary images around the region and as you noticed, it doesn't seem to have a no_right_turn restriction. Not sure how this mistake happened. Removing this erroneous turn restriction. Thanks for flagging this. Please let know if there are more cases similar to this.

Regards,

Hello 五折叔,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contributions to the map. In this edit, a city - Gongyi was deleted. Would be good to know the reason for this deletion. Please be careful during your further edits.
Thank you.

Hello Srihari,
Dropping here few links related to using `brand:wikidata`.
- osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Wikidata#brand:wikidata.3D.2A
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Module:OSM

Hello,
Welcome and thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. In reference with changeset/48670749, the edit seems to be fixed. The footway that was added in the edit was supposed to be added as `highway=footway` and `type=route` is not a proper tag.
Refer to the wiki: osm.wiki/Relation:route and highway=footway
Thanks.

Hello,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for contributing. The hot spring (node/4854479289) which has been in this edit lacks the primary tag to denote it as a `spring`. Refer this wiki: natural=spring
Would be great if you can fix this. Let me know if you need more help.

Hello,
Welcome and thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. The park added in this edit was fixed in reference with changeset/48686477.

Hello elpanzer,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution. In this edit, I observed that you have renamed a way from `Sodomy` to `Dirty Sanchez` which looked suspicious. Can you please confirm that a cycle way exists by this name? `name` tags are to be only used to denote the actual name of the way. Use `description` to indicate any details of the way.
Please refer to the following wiki:
- name=*
- description=*
Let me know if you need further help.

Thank you.

Hello gshockfreak,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for you contribution. In this changeset, observed that you have added an area and added `building=yes` tag. way/488309612 But the `building=*` cannot be used to indicate the boundary. The building tags are used to trace only the actual buildings
Refer to the wiki,
building=*
This area could be denoted using `landuse=residential` tag.
wiki: landuse=*

Thank you.

Hello HCrockett,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for your contribution. In this edit you added a well and also added the `name=well` tag. This is not the general practice and `name` tag is used to indicate specific names. Please be careful during your further edits.
Thank you.

Hello Ryan Yantz,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for you contribution. In this changeset, observed that you have added an area and added `building=yes` tags for the following ways.
- way/487527496
- way/487527494

But the `building=*` cannot be used to indicate the boundary. The building tags are used to trace only the actual buildings
Refer to the wiki,
building=*
Thank you.

Hello Lucas Madrigal,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for you contribution. In this changeset, observed that you have added an area and added `building=school` tag. way/462181526/ But the `building=*` cannot be used to indicate the boundary. The building tags are used to trace only the actual buildings
Refer to the wiki,
building=*

Thank you.

Hello Cristocracies,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap and Thank you for your contributions. In this edit, I observed that you have added a tag `landuse=ground cover` for a park which is an invalid tag. Please refer the wiki for details and appropriate tags. landuse=*
Have deleted the invalid tag. Please be careful during your further edits.

Thank you.

Hello Strolj,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for you contribution. In this changeset, observed that you have modified an area and added a tag `building=yes` way/28593656. But the correct tag would be to use `landuse=*` to represent an area like this which already has the actual buildings traced inside the boundary. The building tags are used to trace only the actual buildings and not to indicate the boundary of a complex.
Refer to the below wikis,
- building=*
- landuse=*

Let me know if you need any further help.

Thank you.

Hello robertosigala,
Welcome and Thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. In this changeset, I observed that you have a changed the tag of an `administrative boundary` to a `footway`. Can you please provide a verifiable source for this? Please map the features which exists in reality. The edit to admin boundary has been reverted. Please be careful during your further edits.
Thank you.

Hello jammypixpoodle,
Welcome and thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. In this edit, I observed in this edit that you have added a pond which doesn't seem to exist in the imagery and the source in this changeset says `Bing aerial`. Could you please provide a verifiable source ? This kind of edit where the features doesn't exist in reality is considered as a bad edit. Hence, this feature has been removed from the map. Please be careful during your further edits.
Thank you.