OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
175466221

These updates are great, thanks! The 'on' shouldn't be capitalised though :)
"Bexhill-on-Sea".

172319017

Hi Chris,
The road reopened today in both directions, so I've made the necessary changes to the map.
Cheers,
Alex

173225598

I agree with you, not sure why user UtterCutter changed to Saint. Having driven this road it is definitely labelled St. Francis Farm. Thanks.

173052397

Thanks for updating the dentist closure, you dropped the building tag so I've restored that back. Cheers, Alex

173052776

Thanks. A useful bit of history, I recognise Meads name from the Wilton Court Hotel he also funded.

172319017

Hey Canalsman, I hope you don't mind but I've changed the following tags:
remove: noexit=yes
add: motor_vehicle=no
add: bicycle=yes
add: foot=yes
add: construction=minor
From what I hear it may reopen in December and close again in January, I'll keep an eye on it.
Cheers, Alex

170665229

Heh, sorry I didn't mean to insinuate anything or be so blunt in my question. I have been using the contact prefix for everything in Bexhill and just wondered if I was acting misguided, thanks.

170665229

Hi, I am curious - what is wrong with using the 'contact:website' tagging scheme?

148457263

Hey Thingummy, the lighthouse base has been completely removed now. What's the best course of action, delete the whole way?
Alex

168839500

Hi again. This 'shop' is not verifiable by anyone visiting the location.
I know it to be a residential house, not a shop with any publicly accessible premises.
Temporary objects like vehicles should not be mapped either.
Hope that helps.
Alex

168236426

No problem, I can revert those changes for you.
I think the van can still be seen as advertising as we're only supposed to only map permanent objects.
Cheers.

168236426

Hello there. I know this to be a residential property. It is best only map company's that have a publicly visitable address, otherwise it is seen as advertising and should not be included on OSM. Thanks, Alex

166886567

No problem! Many such cases... :)

166886567

I will amend these so they are entrance nodes as described here - addr:flats=*.
Thanks, Alex

164872833

Ah very nice... I did start this, but you must have a more automated way of tagging :)

160719274

Just a heads up that Bexhill is (mostly) aligned to OSMUK Cadastral Parcels. Bing is slightly unaligned here.

160651494

FYI the name St. Andrews Place is already tagged as the addr:housename. I've added the tags "amenity:1900-2011=place_of_worship" and "building:1900-2011=church" for better clarity.

160519476

Thanks! If you know any other postcodes feel free to add them :)

159600522

Thanks. Sometimes JOSM doesn't flag these geometry issues. Is there a tool I can use to check for intersecting ways?

159376011

Thanks for adding those missing houses. I have learnt the road is called is called 'Rohan Ascent', would you happen to know why?