It's both, taking care of it now (and hopefully it works this time)

Having been advised of the standard import procedures, I intend to revert this as soon as my rate-limit expires

Having been advised of the standard import procedures, I intend to revert this as soon as my rate-limit expires

Having been advised of the standard import procedures, I intend to revert this as soon as my rate-limit expires

Having been advised of the standard import procedures, I intend to revert this as soon as my rate-limit expires

Having been advised of the standard import procedures, I intend to revert this as soon as my rate-limit expires

Having been advised of the standard import procedures, I intend to revert this as soon as my rate-limit expires

Makes sense. I think the data in question is already ported to Wikipedia, so knock yourself out

Thanks for pointing this out! I meant to make a relation for the Town of Huntingdon, which contains but is distinct from the CDP of Huntingdon. I'll fix that now

After going over the bridge this past weekend, I can confirm that there is a sidewalk on the eastbound side; however, it's inaccessible before the ramp currently under construction from Fish House Road, so if you were going to implement anything I say mark it as under construction

Also you're right about that being a two-way; I'll fix that now

I don't know any more than you do, since I'm not in the area rn, but I intend to drive through this area next weekend to recon what's there and what's not- I'll give an update then

Whoop! My bad. Thanks for cleaning that mess up!

Mostly bc I didn't understand how Overpass API worked, so I used the OSM website to work instead, but then it complains if you change too many tags without putting them in relation. I know it's not the soundest logic, but now that I understand how Overpass API works, I'm gonna undo this soon

In the 1950's and 1960's, Bergen County experimented with overlaying long-haul routes over their existing system of county routes, numbered 1-24. Though the routes were signed, this system fell out of fashion, and they are no longer recognized by the state highway department, as indicated on their logs. However, OSM still held onto this outdated system, though in a patchy and inconsistent manner. To rectify this inconsistency, all routes numbered 1-24 have been removed, and the traditional markers that the NJDOT recognises are instated instead. OSM also wasn't sure about the status of many other routes, and so they were given parenthesis to indicate unsureness. After referencing NJDOT's files, it was clear that all of the uncertain designations (except CR 91) were still enforced, and so many ref tags were changed from "(#)" to "CR #" to make clear that these designations are official. (CR 91 was deleted since it's no longer recognized by the DOT).