Small parking next to dagcentrum is closed.

Currently, cars are allowed to use the busbaan and access=destination for access to spoed... Or use ring noord.

Hello multimob. Why remove the name tag? It is called 'busbaan' in the communication around it. Like https://wmimages.uzleuven.be/styles/bb8d67e3da164c4556ec65b16a74c7b3c5a6622b/2025-05/omgevingsplan_campus_gasthuisberg_vanaf_2_juni_2025_met_circulatie.jpg and many others.

This cycleway is under construction. It is not complete at the Celestijnenlaan side. I would call it dangerous to use it.

OSRM routing is updated, not through rocky old train track any more: osm.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bike&route=42.22576%2C14.55790%3B42.21341%2C14.58498#map=16/42.21958/14.57143&layers=Y

Agree about the west part being track, I did not touch that.
Agree about bicycle=yes, it was from someone else, I removed it.
Agree about speed limits: not useful to map them.
Last week, I took an (unmapped) path uphill, connecting new track to old railway track, pushing electric city bike by hand. Not really a problem. Not mapped because change expected. Uploaded GPX now.

We will have to check OSRM routing in 2 days:
https://routing.openstreetmap.de/about.html

Change is a success: Two of the 3 bicycle routers currently do not route over the horrible part. osm.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_bicycle&route=42.22529%2C14.55907%3B42.21374%2C14.58442#map=15/42.21873/14.57452&layers=Y

I removed bicycle=yes on a part which is OK since it was redundant (double).
On the horrible part, it is now bicycle=dismount, smotheness:horrible, surface=gravel and the rcn (regional cycle network) indications are moved to SS16.
That should prevent routing software to route bicycles through this path, except if they really want to prevent the highway=primary.

I was there last week and had a flat tire.
That is why i updated as much as possible. bicycle=yes indicates bicycles are legally allowed. So that seems OK.
I moved the tags for the cycle route to the SS16.

The stairways more to the north are still closed I assume.

At the time I did the changeset, I did a physical survey. But yours is more recent.

super

Is knooppunt 7 juist gemaped? Nu de fietspaden aan beide kanten zijn opgenomen maar er slechts aan één kant een knooppunt loopt de route van knooppunt 6 over 7 naar 10 nogal raar aan knooppunt 7.

changeset/119039338#map=18/50.87751/4.68311

Dat lijkt me een éénzijdige pro-alexianen toelichting.
De straat heet sinds kort Lemmensberg, de LUCA campus heet Lemmens, ...
Ik heb 20 jaar in de Herestraat gewoond en nooit van Alexianenpark gehoord, ...
Ik heb goed gezocht naar Alexianenpark in de communicatie van UZ Gasthuisberg, maar niets gevonden... (is het Alexiane-park zoals je schrijft?)
Maar wegwijzers zijn belangrijk uiteraard.

Ik markeerde gisteren alt_name=alexianenpark, maar dat ziet niet iedereen (eufemisme). Ik zal het aanpassen, ook al is het niet volgens de osm regels.

Ik zie geen voorkeur voor Alexianenpark in Wikipedia geschiedenis.
https://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lemmenspark&action=history

Google heeft 103 resultaten voor Alexianenpark en 292 voor Lemmenspark
https://www.google.com/search?q=alexianenpark
https://www.google.com/search?q=lemmenspark

Google zag RLD, de projectontwikkelaar 8 keer Lemmenspark gebruiken en 9 keer Alexianenpark.

https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Arld.be+lemmenspark&oq=site%3Arld.be

https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Arld.be+alexianenpark&oq=site%3Arld.be