AzatRiver's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 152221103 | about 1 year ago | Hello bernardo60, thanks for reaching out. The Indonesia tagging guidelines (osm.wiki/Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines#Roads) state that living street is appropriate for narrow road features that are narrow for only one car but also are "accessible to motorbikes and inaccessible to cars”. For the living street feature way/701109726, the motorcar=no tag prohibits vehicular travel but the classification does not seem to be an issue. I could also see it meeting the definition for track. However, the the living street feature without motorcar=no tag (way/701109604) appears in this ground level image (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-8.5946086257659&lng=115.32843015873243&z=18.306176427320903&pKey=480661337264850&focus=photo) to wide enough to "be passed by 1 car at low speed” which meets the specific tagging guidelines. This convention is widely adopted and in practice across Indonesia as a whole. Thanks and have a good day. |
| 151442759 | over 1 year ago | Thank you! |
| 151442759 | over 1 year ago | Hello FajarAlim, thank you for confirming the connections here. I will add them back. Since you are a local to the area, would you happen to know if this section of highway is drivable, or if it is for pedestrians only? Thanks! |
| 151662361 | over 1 year ago | Hello FajarAlim, I did not modify the classification to way/1120098253. It looks like that was from GrabID_Utami Gendis in changeset/148576232.
Terjemahan Otomatis: Halo FajarAlim, saya tidak mengubah klasifikasi menjadi way/1120098253. Sepertinya itu dari GrabID_Utami Gendis di changeset/148576232.
|
| 151565113 | over 1 year ago | Hello FajarAlim, thanks for reaching out. The classification change made was consistent with tagging conventions (osm.wiki/Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines#Roads) for Indonesia. The roads appear to provide access to housing and between settlements rather than to allocate traffic between major administrative areas or cities. This short segment is not listed on the Ministry of Public Works and Housing (Kementerian PUPR) Dashboard Infrastruktur map (https://sigi.pu.go.id/astv2/) as a jalan nasional road. I thought that was the authority on the trunk classification in Indonesia. way/1054396269 seems misplaced as a trunk in my opinion. Is there any other sources to support assigning trunk as the classification? If so, I can make that change back to that classification. Best regards. Halo FajarAlim, terima kasih sudah menghubungi. Perubahan klasifikasi yang dilakukan konsisten dengan konvensi penandaan (osm.wiki/Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines#Roads) untuk Indonesia. Jalan tersebut tampaknya menyediakan akses ke perumahan dan antar permukiman dibandingkan untuk mengalokasikan lalu lintas antar wilayah administratif atau kota besar. Ruas pendek ini tidak tercantum dalam peta Dashboard Infrastruktur Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat (Kementerian PUPR) (https://sigi.pu.go.id/astv2/) sebagai jalan nasional. Saya kira itu kewenangan klasifikasi batang di Indonesia. way/1054396269 menurut saya tampaknya salah tempat sebagai bagasi. Apakah ada sumber lain yang mendukung penetapan trunk sebagai klasifikasi? Jika demikian, saya dapat melakukan perubahan kembali ke klasifikasi itu. Salam. |