Avocadough!'s Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 108702967 | over 3 years ago | Hi erickdeoliveiraleal, According to the OSM wiki access = psv is discouraged. Should we add psv=yes to this way? Here is a link to the page I was referencing:: access=* |
| 118153218 | almost 4 years ago | Hello, What resources did you use to support these name edits? |
| 115809800 | almost 4 years ago | Yes correct the motor_vehicle tags are more specific and accurate. I removed the destination tag as you suggested. Thanks |
| 115177263 | about 4 years ago | Hi 4004, Thanks for letting me know. |
| 113525669 | about 4 years ago | Hi mariotomo! Your lane tagging looks great here! Very nice. I see you also use the JOSM editor. I like to use the “Lane and road attributes” paint style to visualize lane details I add, if you don’t already have it loaded I highly recommend it. Was it the southern section of the link (way/557442923) being bidirectional that looked off to you when you said the intersection looked “too awful to be true”? When I was looking at it I thought it looked odd as well to to be bidirectional since it looks a little narrow for two lanes, but it’s the only logical connection for the turn lane on way/1000539354, and cars seem to be using it to go to the motorway. I agree, it would be good to have more Mapillary ground imagery coming from the north to see if there are any destination signs or anything directing traffic south on that link to get to the motorway. Let me know if you need anything anytime!
|
| 112430180 | about 4 years ago | Hi Samuel, Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I have restored the previous configuration and adjusted the turn restriction to allow for traffic to proceed north from Avenida Isidro Centeno López. Happy mapping! - Stephani |
| 107517698 | over 4 years ago | I was basing my edits off of the policies in the OSM wiki. Please let me know if you are aware of any other practices than this. |
| 91443802 | over 5 years ago | https://www.elrancaguino.cl/2020/02/04/asi-cambia-el-transito-vehicular-en-calles-de-rancagua-ante-nuevas-regulaciones/
|
| 84486786 | over 5 years ago | I agree. I removed the footway and added foot = yes and sidewalk = both tags to the road. |
| 80553124 | almost 6 years ago | Thanks for the message, I changed the road back to track. |
| 80555839 | almost 6 years ago | Thank you for the advice Muralito! I have made the revision. |
| 65565076 | over 6 years ago | Taken care of. |
| 62499719 | about 7 years ago | Hey ff5722, Thank you for the information. Going forward I will be more careful with my classification edits in China. |
| 62496434 | about 7 years ago | Hi ff5722, I chose the primary classification because it seems the road dead-ends onto a primary road in the north. I was unaware of the true nature of the road and will defer to your local knowledge! I edited my changes back to your original classification. Thanks! Avocadough! |
| 62495066 | over 7 years ago | Hi ff5722, Thank you for sharing the Chinese classification resources with me. I will utilize these policies when editing in China in the future. Happy mapping! Avocadough! |
| 56733327 | over 7 years ago | Hello Andi, I modeled the junction based on Digital Globe imagery, which is the newest imagery that I know of in the area and it matches GPS traces here. I’m curious what sources you used for the new roundabout? I am always interested in more up-to-date resources for improving the map. Thanks! |
| 56356939 | almost 8 years ago | Hi mbethke, You are correct that tunnel=culvert is the appropriate tag for the canal. I corrected the tags back, thanks! |