OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
126977769

À propos des Me-A1, Me-A2 et MeMo-6, s'agissait-il d'ouvrages intégrés dans les culées des ponts ?

126977769

D'où ma proposition pour transférer ces informations sur OpenHistoricalMap.

Aurais-tu des photos ou un plan du PL-8 qui a été démoli il y a quelques années ?

126977769

Salut,
Ça ne me dérange pas, loin de là vu que je participe activement à OpenHistoricalMap mais aussi bête que cela puisse paraître c'est la règle (et la raison de la création du projet OpenHistoricalMap). Je t'ai mis ci-dessus un lien vers un article wiki du projet qui explique cela, OpenStreetMap n'est pas le lieu pour faire de la cartographique historique.

126977769

Salut,
Les éléments démolis n'ont pas leur place sur OpenStreetMap osm.wiki/Nonexistent_features

Je te proposes de transférer les six bunkers démolis sur OpeenHistoricalMap pour pouvoir préserver ces informations que tu as ajoutées.

153409917

Salut,
Le bunker au nord est celui-ci ?
https://wikimaginot.eu/V70_construction_detail.php?id=18555

176667051

`source:url` redirects to the source tag page, so I assume they have the same status.

The fact that it's used millions of times (source_ref is, source_ref:geometry isn't) doesn't change the fact that it would make more sense to have `source:geometry` and `source:geometry:url`, which share a common structure like `source` and `source:url`, rather than `source_ref:geometry`. This, along with the fact that `source:geometry:ref` is already used for content other than URLs, is a significant factor.

176667051

I find it much more intuitive to have a source:geometry and source:geometry:url than a source:geometry and source_ref:geometry.

176667051

Okay, but this breaks the hierarchy of source:geometry and moreover source:geometry:ref is already used for something other than urls, source:url being already used and approved, I would therefore prefer a derivative source:geometry:url in this case.

176667051

Hi,
source:geometry:link is used to provide a link for a source:geometry, source_ref:geometry is not appropriate here

105248730

osm.wiki/FR:Cartographie_des_routes_en_France#S%C3%A9paration_des_voies_(un_ou_deux_%22way%22_parall%C3%A8les)

105248730

Place Pierre Semard, il n'y a pas lieu de créer deux voies de circulation mappées séparément quand il n'y a pas de séparation physique entre elles.

176332437

Salut,
Merci de ne pas supprimer les rues pour les recréer 5 minutes plus tard en ayant supprimé la source:geometry.

175673031

I'm not very comfortable with date namespaces. The chosen format, TAG:DATE-DATE, is both imprecise (no month, no day) and unusable for querying and data processing. Furthermore, we already have start_date:namespace for that.

However, on reflection, the current_situation tag isn't descriptive enough; "latest development" would be clearer. This doesn't preclude using the tags you mentioned, though.

175673031

Hi,
Sorry for the delayed response. The building was divided in two in 1968 and both were extended. The southern building has not undergone any changes since then, hence the current situation = 1968. The northern building had an annex demolished in 2023, hence the 2023.

175673031

Hi,
In the case of buildings with a complex history, this allows users to pinpoint the last modification made to the building. There's a note below explaining this: "1895 Mascara depot (TRT); 1968 expansion and conversion into warehouses; 2023 demolition of a northern section."

173483930

Hi,

All mm ways should be in m as of now.

I've shifted most of them from min/max to start/end when the road is shifting from one width to another such as this one way/1426169241

However there are ways which do not switch from one width to another but rather have a varying widht, and in those cases min/max is appropriate. Should I ask for a wiki page to be created ?

173529294

Shift from wikimaginot url to ref:wikimaginot is done ;-)

173529294

Thanks, I'll add it !

173529294

ref:wikimaginot seems the most appropriate, isn't it ?

How can I ask for the ref:wikimaginot to provide a link with the tag id in a similar way as other ref:tags do ?

173536648

Par contre, si les entrées sont dissociées (l'une 72, l'autre 74...), tu peux mettre un point avec entrance=main ou yes et l'adresse sur ce point.
osm.wiki/FR:Adresses#B%C3%A2timents_avec_plusieurs_num%C3%A9ros_d'adresses