Arflha's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 126977769 | À propos des Me-A1, Me-A2 et MeMo-6, s'agissait-il d'ouvrages intégrés dans les culées des ponts ? |
|
| 126977769 | D'où ma proposition pour transférer ces informations sur OpenHistoricalMap. Aurais-tu des photos ou un plan du PL-8 qui a été démoli il y a quelques années ? |
|
| 126977769 | Salut,
|
|
| 126977769 | Salut,
Je te proposes de transférer les six bunkers démolis sur OpeenHistoricalMap pour pouvoir préserver ces informations que tu as ajoutées. |
|
| 153409917 | Salut,
|
|
| 176667051 | `source:url` redirects to the source tag page, so I assume they have the same status. The fact that it's used millions of times (source_ref is, source_ref:geometry isn't) doesn't change the fact that it would make more sense to have `source:geometry` and `source:geometry:url`, which share a common structure like `source` and `source:url`, rather than `source_ref:geometry`. This, along with the fact that `source:geometry:ref` is already used for content other than URLs, is a significant factor. |
|
| 176667051 | I find it much more intuitive to have a source:geometry and source:geometry:url than a source:geometry and source_ref:geometry. |
|
| 176667051 | Okay, but this breaks the hierarchy of source:geometry and moreover source:geometry:ref is already used for something other than urls, source:url being already used and approved, I would therefore prefer a derivative source:geometry:url in this case. |
|
| 176667051 | Hi,
|
|
| 105248730 | ||
| 105248730 | Place Pierre Semard, il n'y a pas lieu de créer deux voies de circulation mappées séparément quand il n'y a pas de séparation physique entre elles. |
|
| 176332437 | Salut,
|
|
| 175673031 | I'm not very comfortable with date namespaces. The chosen format, TAG:DATE-DATE, is both imprecise (no month, no day) and unusable for querying and data processing. Furthermore, we already have start_date:namespace for that. However, on reflection, the current_situation tag isn't descriptive enough; "latest development" would be clearer. This doesn't preclude using the tags you mentioned, though. |
|
| 175673031 | Hi,
|
|
| 175673031 | Hi,
|
|
| 173483930 | Hi, All mm ways should be in m as of now. I've shifted most of them from min/max to start/end when the road is shifting from one width to another such as this one way/1426169241 However there are ways which do not switch from one width to another but rather have a varying widht, and in those cases min/max is appropriate. Should I ask for a wiki page to be created ? |
|
| 173529294 | Shift from wikimaginot url to ref:wikimaginot is done ;-) |
|
| 173529294 | Thanks, I'll add it ! |
|
| 173529294 | ref:wikimaginot seems the most appropriate, isn't it ? How can I ask for the ref:wikimaginot to provide a link with the tag id in a similar way as other ref:tags do ? |
|
| 173536648 | Par contre, si les entrées sont dissociées (l'une 72, l'autre 74...), tu peux mettre un point avec entrance=main ou yes et l'adresse sur ce point.
|