OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
164375037 9 months ago

Hi A67-A67,
Thank you for reaching out and correcting my edits. I was making edits based on recent GPS traces which showed a small deviation from the existing road centerlines.

163012850 11 months ago

Hi gurglypipe,
thank you for reverting the changeset, based on your knowledge and experience.
Regards!

161446654 12 months ago

Hi Eggie,
Thank you for making the corrections and feedback given.
While making changes to the junction configuration, I overlooked the continuation of the cycle relation and failed to add the bicycle=use_sidepath tags. I have made the corrections. I appreciate you bringing this to my attention, and I will be more diligent in the future edits.

157710294 about 1 year ago

Hi, 4000 big face,
As part of the hotosm-project-17520_AndhraMapping24 project, you are supposed to work in the Andhra Pradesh region but you have added buildings and removed power=pole from the power=line tag combination in Indiana/Detroit border region in the USA which is incorrect.
As per the wiki guidelines, the polygon should be orthogonalized while capturing as per reality and no redundant nodes should be present on the building polygons.
According to the wiki guidelines, power=pole should be added for power=line but not to the abandoned railway lines as these lines will not be operative.
I have made the corrections.
Happy Mapping!!

157710673 about 1 year ago

Hi 4000 big face,
As part of the hotosm-project-17520_AndhraMapping24 project, you are supposed to work in the Andhra Pradesh region but you have added buildings in the Indiana/Detroit border region in the USA which is incorrect.
As per the wiki guidelines, building polygons should be orthogonalized while capturing as per reality and no redundant nodes should be present on the building polygons.
I have made the corrections.
Happy Mapping!!!

156251294 about 1 year ago

Hi adi_mapcreator,
I’ve connected the barrier=wall with highway=service as connectivity is somehow visible in Bing Aerial Imagery giving us hints that there is some entrance from the main highway and leading road to access the inside houses. This will also help us to avoid the JOSM Validation error i,e Crossing barrier/highway which appeared to have been generated by your edits and seems it was not not highlighted in ID Editor.

In Order to answer your question, I agree with your point and it's difficult to judge from imagery whether there is a barrier present or not but when you will analyze the data, this is the only entrance to access those north side buildings(house no-95/2) which is accessible from Soi Prasat Suk and that is the reason I didn't add any barrier tag but intersected the highway as per guidelines. I hope this answers your questions satisfactorily?

For your information I am using the JOSM Tool which is more advanced than the ID editor and you will get by default validation errors for such type of edits which we cant ignore. Happy Mapping!

155968302 about 1 year ago

Hi adi_mapcreator,
I referred to both Bing Aerial Imagery and Esri World Imagery at this location -7.2918489, 107.8682335 and there is no visible path connectivity. When we refer to Bing imagery we can clearly see connectivity towards the southern side of the track highway i.e -7.2930542, 107.8671116 in the form of a field path. This will rightly solve the error for Fix Isolated Pedestrians network challenge. Let me know if you have further questions. Happy Mapping!

154893582 over 1 year ago

Hello julcnx
Thank you for mapping!
I have added missing connectivity and fixed an incorrect tag for highway for way/936714419 and way/1285095598.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!

156333941 over 1 year ago

Hello Putri22
I have fixed and modified the geometry; there is no connectivity from node/6261100841 to node/6258988186.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!

156313858 over 1 year ago

Hello Fathima Nifla
Thank you for mapping!
I have added connectivity in 3.2491933, 99.4289589.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!

156346295 over 1 year ago

Hello Fathima Nifla
Thank you for mapping!
I restored a deleted waterway tag way/472604736 and aligned it according to Bing Aerial Imagery.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!

155968302 over 1 year ago

Hello adi_mapcreator
Thank you for mapping!
I have aligned highway connectivity
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!

156251294 over 1 year ago

Hello adi_mapcreator
I have fixed validation error - Crossing barrier/highway.
Please inspect your task carefully before closing.
Happy Mapping!

154916584 over 1 year ago

Hi daaanna, Thank you for feedback and reverting the changeset. I referred to the OSM wiki guidelines and removed the highway links as there is no solid triangular island near the junction.

154916584 over 1 year ago

Hi daaanna, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.

153727388 over 1 year ago

Hi canfe,
Thank you for reaching out, I have made the corrections and restored the previous outline of the building. I will be more careful in the future.

149305174 almost 2 years ago

Hi Supaplex,
I reviewed all available imagery at this location but couldn't find that the crossover exists. There is a crossover about 100 meters to the west of my edit location that appears to provide the ability to u-turn to the opposite carriageway.

149305174 almost 2 years ago

Hi supaplex,
Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you

148679674 almost 2 years ago

Hi MacLondon, Thank you for your detail clarification. I have reverted this junction edits and kept the data as it was modeled previously.

148679674 almost 2 years ago

Hi MacLondon, Thanks for your feedback, for better aesthetic appearance in cartography I remodeled by ending the dual carriageway post junction and also added dual carriageway on the tertiary road to route around the solid dividing barrier. If you feel it is impacting any routing algorithm or incorrectly reflects reality, then I welcome your feedback. Thankyou