Jag har lagt till Älvravinerna som jag tror det borde vara. Kolla om du tycker det ser vettigt ut.

Var det tänkt att denna relation skulle inkludera alla tre delar av Älvravinerna?

Thanks for fixing this and for improving the map!

Is the path over the dam gone?

I'm sorry if I'm sounding a bit harsch, that's not my intention. I'm not able to find the source now. I did read a lot of information for upgrades of the power lines/stations but it was some years ago.

I see now that the OSM wiki states that "the system operator's designation should be used".
I don't like that. Thats not the meaning of nominal and in Sweden the regional power network are are classed (or refered to) as 130 kV, or sometimes more specific, 132 kV (or 150 kV in some cases).
I give you a random link as an example: https://www.vattenfalleldistribution.se/var-verksamhet/projekt/samrad/ort/sala-heby/
In this case it was 138 kV since I added that.

To my knowledge nominal is not a class, it's what you "aim for", then you have deviances from the nominal voltage. I've never heard the word used a class before.

To use the class instead of the "aimed for" voltage is odd. There is a reason we add road width in actual meters, not a wrong value set by the class of the way. Can you think of any other values in OSM handeled in that way?

The difference between this substation and many other substation is that for this one it was known what the voltage level was.
What you do may look nicer on a map, but it is changing something right to something wrong and downgrading data. Change the map if you don't like the look, don't make the data false.
Where the voltage level is known, maybe by spending one hour to find out you shall not remove it just because all other are not known. The key is "voltage". You may add another key if you want, if you feel a need to state that the equipment it is around the 130 kV level/group or something like that.

I think you should revert all your edits where you have downgraded the data.

Please don't change things you don't know anything about.
Here is a quote from one of the major electric companys in Sweden :
"Usually, lines at the current voltage level are called 130 kV lines. The line's operating voltage (nominal voltage) is actually slightly higher than this value, namely 138 kV. The line's design voltage, i.e. the highest voltage for which the plant is designed, is in this case 145 kV."

I have changed it back to 138 kV.

Hej igen!
Hur var det med dessa vägar? Får man verkligen inte vistas på dom?

Hej!
Är det verkligen access=no på dessa två vägar?
Saker kan ju ha ändrats, men när jag var där sist var motorfordon förbjudna på den första och på den andra var det tillåtet att åka med motorfordon, men genomfart var förbjuden.
way/38208729
way/1465296316

Tackar!

Tack för att du förbättrar kartan!
Södra Strandgatan har access=no. Stämmer det eller är den öppnad så att den går att använda? I så fall ska access=no tas bort.

Maybe you could correct those cases where you removed data that just should have been updated?

I added wood_provided, since that was the meaning of the tag when it was added. Any more cases like this?

Hello again 市川ゆり子!
I see nothing has happened regarding to name:en on ting that should not have name:en. Did you go through the edits?

Tänkte du building=yes eller ska det kanske vara något mer specifikt? Vad jag vet har dom både utveckling och tillverkning.

Hej!

Är det diken eller bäckar? I skogen ser det ut som bäckar som slingrar sig, men jag har aldrig sett dom med egna ögon, så du vet garanterat bättre.

Thank you for your reply! I have just looked at a sample so I don't have the whole picture.
Maybe you could go through the changed things again and correct the tags that did not turn out to be so good?

No response from 市川ゆり子.
I think this changeset shall be reverted.

Hej!
Tack för att du förbättrar kartan!
Sätt gärna foot=yes och bicyle=yes på grindar ifall detta är tillåtet, i annat fall förhindras ruttning.

Oftast gäller allemansrätten.

Tack för svar och snabb ändring!