Apologies, I wasn't try to accuse you of anything. I just disagree with the assessment, opening a community discussion seems like a sensible move.

Bridleways are primarily for horse riders AND pedestrians, not just horse riders.

Just because some bridleways may be unsuitable for bicycles doesn't mean that it should be avoided as a way type. If you wish to convey that a way is suitability surfaced, consider adding
smoothness=*
tracktype=*
tags to the way.

Changing tags just so the path appears blue on a specific renderer is 'tagging for the renderer' which is frowned upon. Other cycling specific renderers such as CyclOSM already render it as blue based on the surface type.

If the bridleway was also public bridleway, it should also have the tag designation=public_bridleway

Hope this helps.

It is a 'bridleway' because it is intended for use by horse riders. A path doesn't need to be a 'public bridleway' (legal right of way) to be tagged as a bridleway.
See: highway=bridleway

As for access tagging, [foot/horse]=designated is correct over [foot/horse]=yes, because 'designated' means there is signage indicating it is for use by those modes, whereas 'yes' means there is a legal right of way.
See: access=*

Hi Jackalus, I assume you are talking about the Newcastle CAZ. I didn't map this feature, I just modified it slightly while making other changes - it was originally added (changeset/159749704) by goncalo_oliveira, feel free to reach out to them. I might take a look at this at some point if I get around to it. Thanks.

good stuff :P

Did you edit this while you were still watching Geoff's video lmao 😂
Speed demon.

Hey, I was wondering why you decided to remove / replace some of the wikidata links for some of these nodes?

This was to add the secondary (middle) stop light of the set - which stops cyclists from passing through the right orifice (where there may be oncoming vehicles), making them pass though the cycle lane instead.

Ah thanks for that. As for the oneway-ness, they are definitely marked as if to indicate their use in this manner (complete with available crossing points). I'm not sure if there legally can be an explicitly one-way cycle path in the UK? But either way it is how are supposed to be used.

Thanks for the spot. My bad.

Ah, sorry, the small section of Coppergate was missing a contraflow bike lane tag, and figured it must have been missed because of the split.

Should be fixed now.