Hi Palina, Thanks for finding my obvious mistake. I've made the correcton.
Alan

My mistake. Confused by boundary being same as road. Corrected. Thanks for pointing out the error.

OK, deleted the tag. Thanks

I believe this is correctly tagged. It building is a typical forest service toilet. There is nothing else in the building.

I removed the pitch inside the pitch since the sports center was for soccer. I don't see a way to make separate pitches for the multiple overlapping fields.

I don't remember. They are not necessary.

I agree with both comments. The changeset includes streams and tracks that were traced in a small section of a Sitgraeves NF in Arizona and a minor node change on Cape Cod, MA. Should have used a second changeset. I appologize.

I've noticed (survey) that a few of these roads no longer exist. I changed one to abandoned:highway and another to a footway and driveway segment and deleted the rest. Was there a historical objective to the edits?

I

Hi Tom, Nice to hear from you. See
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=11351528&map=15!42.3949!-71.3365
It is a nice walk I recommend to friends. Parking at both ends makes it an nice route over several properties. I especially like the boardwalk at different times of the year.
Alan

osmc:symbol not matching symbol= on relation/12107000
Not trying to be picky, just curious based on slack discussions.

The problem was caused by a mapper who incorrectly added a footway on top of a road when trying to create a long hiking trail. Adding a "crossing" to an intersection with a footway was a correct action on your part.

A crossing was added at the intersection of a street and a driveway. I believe this was in error.

Hi, I extended the handicapped access aisle connecting it to the parking aisle. That way a router can get folks from one place to another. Nice work thinking of the handicapped customer.

Nice work adding boardwalk.

Neat way to adapt "ball" golf to "disc".
I added the name "The Lyons Den Disc Golf Course"

Thank you for your effort. I've seen a lot of nice work by 93Ice and assumed he was trying to docent townships and just gave up 6 years ago.

These ways have no tags and are not part of any relation. They are 6 years old. Is it ok to delete them?

Thanks for fixing this.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96587621

I'm not so sure about removing private CR's. They do indicate that the land is "conserved"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96796032