For your information, edit war continues in changeset/49133727 and changeset/49133791

Dear, Diana777. Unfortunately, you are continuing edit war on this particular object without community discussion.
Please read information in changeset/48580533 ,
changeset/48714592 ,
changeset/48533533 ,
changeset/47757296

Hello, noteka and welcome in OSM. Although you perform right the same activity in OSM, as OSM user Diana777 peviously I should inform you about your mistakes.

We welcome all new users and are glad to receive corrections to the map. At the same time, we expect the changes to improve the map, NOT SERVE SOME OTHER GOAL - be it playing some online game or anything else.

While it is nice that PART of this area in the past, more than hundred years ago was a manor park, it is not officially designated as a park currently - please see http://www.rigasmezi.lv/lv/Rigas_darzi_un_parki/par_parkiem/Darzi_un_parki_Pardaugavas_iecirknis/ . Please do not engage in edit wars, it is not an appreciated way of solving issues.

MOREOVER, I surveyed this place many times last month, and the territory isn't classified in OpenStreetMap like a park - "A park is an area of open space provided for recreational use, usually designed and in semi-natural state with grassy areas, trees and bushes. Parks are often but not always municipal" (see, leisure=park)

Currently this is a natural forest, with it is own ecosystem, which some people mistakenly or historically call a "park", but this doesn't mean that we should mark as parks all objects that are called this way, if this is forest, or station name, etc.

Even noteka user provided link states, that this is not a park, but a forest - "Anniņmuižas mežs" (where mežs is a forest in Latvian).

Dear, SomeoneElse! Unfortunately no discussion on this change was made within Latvian OSM community. The edit war seem to continue.

Thank you very much!

Hello, geddii!
What is the source of the name of the tagged area?

Hello, geddii!
What is the source of the name of the tagged area?

Dear Diana777 ,
please get aquainted with the comment in changeset/47757296

Dear Diana777 ,
please get aquainted with the comment in changeset/47757296
Also forest definetly should be tagged as forest, not as a park.

A strange wave last weeks of stubborn adding fake parks, duplicate parks, change forests into parks and changing paths into footways from various new users. Could be some pokemon game related vandalism.

The correct changeset comment: details, corrections and updates along 6 tram (Brivibas gatve).
Source: survey; Mapillary; MapBox; RGM

Cien. bicyclelv123456, liels lūgums pirms veikt izmaiņas kartē pārliecināties, vai Jūs to veicāt pareizi. Tā Jūsu pievienotais grāmatu veikals jau ir OSM. To, ko Jūs pievienojāt, Jūs pievienojāt ar kļūdu - nepareizā vietā. Jūsu dublikātu es izdzēsu.
Liels lūgums arī nepievienot organizācijas kā ēkas iekš citās ēkas, bet izmantot tām paredzētu ofisu tagošanas shēmu: office=*
Ar cieņu, OSM lietotājs AkageMuk.

Corrected in changeset/39955672
Also changed one more of the same design closer to Imanta

Hello, arcth!
I'm very sorry. Didn't know this. Tagged in details all towers of this line from survey some time ago, and remember them as duplicated. Will correct the mistake. Will use this information in advance.
Best regards, OSM user AkageMuk

Thanks a lot, arcth, now names comply worldwide OSM practice.
Happy mapping!

Hello, arcth!
You have done a large changeset, but some of the changes are very discussable. (Discussion also possible in Latvian/Russian). E.g. you are putting names for substations like "Apakšstacija „Imanta“", but this is not correct. Pls, see osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
In OSM project the name tag is used only for the name itself. The information, that this is "Apakšstacija" goes from the tags "power=substation". Thus the correct name tag here would be just "Imanta" (without parenthness ofcourse), as this is the official name of the substation. No need to duplicate information, and to transfer information from tags to names.

Hello, aytfadc! The route E22 doesn't go through Lithuania, so you have some mistake in the changeset. Also other (national) names are left untouched.

True mistake :-(, will correct it

Sveiks! Vai nav tā, ka koledžai ir jābūt amenity=college ?

Hi, Valor1! Why you deleted man_made=tower node and created man_made=mast instead of it? It is not necessary to delete objects, if only their properties can be changed. Moreover, the "tower:type=communication" tag now is lost, which specified the type of tower.
Also, what is the "area=yes" polygon? Now it is senseless.
Also, could you please provide more reasonable comments to the changesets, as no "Transformer house" is affected in this particular changeset.

Приветствую, Valor1! Зачем надо было удалять man_made=tower и создавать man_made=mast? Необязательно удалять объект, если можно изменить его свойство. К тому же потерялся уточняющий тег "tower:type=communication".
И для чего создан полигон "area=yes" ? В таком виде он бессмысленный.
Также не могли бы вы писать более содержательные комментарии к правкам, так как никаких "Transformer house" в этой правке не было.