OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
173589439 2 months ago

Thank you!

168281109 6 months ago

Hey Burrado,

Thank you for clarifying and confirming the ref changes here. I appreciate your help!

168281109 6 months ago

Hello Buraddo,

I noticed that you added the ref DJIMO to both the highway (way/1159398579) and this relation (relation/15677177). I wanted to check whether you meant to use the prefix DN instead of DJ, as DN aligns more closely with the current wiki documentation for roads in Romania (osm.wiki/Talk:Ro:Map_Features). Typically, DJ references are reserved for county or lower-class roads, whereas DN is used for national roads. Unless there has been a recent change in the country's reference system that I am not aware of, DN might be more appropriate here. What do you think?

Thank you!

152819400 over 1 year ago

Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2024-01-20

150500281 over 1 year ago

Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; Bing Streetside.

143123069 about 2 years ago

Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2022-06-16

134026840 almost 3 years ago

Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery;Staðfangaskrá.

132007965 almost 3 years ago

Correction:
Comment is "Added turn restriction in areas near Mega Image #adt".
Source used was Esri World Imagery;Mapillary

125286951 over 3 years ago

Hi highflyer74!

Thanks for bringing this to my attention. In retrospect, the highway names which the “Carretera”=* tags represent are too ambiguous at this junction, so I will leave them unnamed as they were before, but I will revise the “MEX”=* tags to be properly formatted “ref”=* tags.
I will also fix the “AVENIDA TECNOL?GICO” street name, which was done by another mapper previously (for example changeset/89049830). I believe it should be Avenida Tecnológico.

Thank you and have a great day!

79619522 almost 4 years ago

Hey Javierpf, thanks for reaching out. At the time of my edit, I removed the oneway tag here citing these Mapillary images, which show cars traveling in both directions (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=523227485499266 and https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=920830785426473). However, I understand these photos are now outdated and will defer to your local knowledge.

Thanks!

105244760 over 4 years ago

Correction: resource used was Bing aerial imagery

102661600 over 4 years ago

Correction: source used was Maxar Premium Imagery

102353865 over 4 years ago

Correction: Comment is "Adjusted turn restriction in areas near Лукойл №131 #adt", source used was Maxar Premium Imagery

100729138 almost 5 years ago

Thank you!

100729138 almost 5 years ago

Hello Kovoschiz, I did not intend to interfere in the discussion but just address some inconsistencies I noticed. I did not notice a significant difference between the two directions of 軍器廠街 Arsenal Street in Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/J9wnh7RWkDDZzK_WeTGI0g). Because the secondary classification did not seem appropriate for the northern portion (way/569675857), I extended the tertiary classification all the way to 軒尼詩道 Hennessy Road, which includes the southern portion you mentioned (way/251356813). This was to ensure both directions of 告士打道 Gloucester Road have equivalent highway connections. I understand if you disagree because I can also envision a few classification schemes in this area.

95071855 about 5 years ago

Спасибо за информацию

95071855 about 5 years ago

Привет Mazda05, спасибо за ссылку. Я теперь вижу в описании «highway = trunk», что он подходит для «дороги к международному аэропорту и крупным портам». Когда я вносил правку, я рассматривал только протяженность трассы А-157.
Рассмотрев текущие данные, мне не совсем понятно, использование классификацее «highway = trunk_link». Почему (way/865710362) является trunk_link, а (way/24919923) - нет? А как насчет (way/53565546) по сравнению с (way/53565548)?
Спасибо,
Admasawi

95444379 about 5 years ago

Hello Kovoschiz, thank you for the information. I have found evidence of the construction, and have updated the data.

93674575 about 5 years ago

Resource used was Esri World Imagery

93201266 about 5 years ago

Hello Kovoschiz,
Thank you for the question. I see the curved paint you're referring to, but I edited the geometry to allow vehicles coming from east (way/841969388) to turn north (way/227755023) as seen in Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=22.38460529132037&lng=114.18966419074142&z=17&pKey=LAirXNJNhmg8q8N6s7BJII&focus=photo). I added a no_straight_on turn restriction (relation/3122346), to accomplish what the curved geometry was preventing before.

Thanks for reaching out, please let me know if you have any more questions about this edit.
- Admasawi