OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
135002770 over 1 year ago

Hi CjMalone,
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I fixed the issue in the changeset - changeset/157751908
Apologies for any trouble.
Best regards!

140924178 over 1 year ago

Hi CjMalone,
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I fixed the issue in the changeset - changeset/157751960
Apologies for any trouble.
Best regards!

148016487 over 1 year ago

Hi CjMalone,
I’m Anastasia. I'm an OSM communications specialist on the OSM mapping team at Lyft.
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I fixed the issue in the changeset - changeset/157570999
Apologies for any trouble.
Best regards!

157156184 over 1 year ago

Hello, Allison P!
I’m Anastasia. I'm an OSM communications specialist on the OSM mapping team at Lyft.
Thank you for your input. The access tag from the TIGER import was outdated, so I removed it in the changeset - changeset/157382622. However, we only add access tags based on clear evidence, such as signs or markings. Since there is no such evidence in this case, I can't add it. Please feel free to add the access tag if you believe it is necessary.
Best regards!

157119137 over 1 year ago

Hi ThatOneFilipinoExtremeist,
I’m Anastasia. I'm an OSM communications specialist on the OSM mapping team at Lyft.
Thank you for the feedback! It's great to know the mapping is spot on.
Best regards!

153243295 over 1 year ago

Hi BPTT,
I’m Anastasia and I'm an OSM communications specialist on the OSM mapping team at Lyft.
The edits were made based on the Lyft-owned sources:
New ways were added according to the Lyft owned satellite image Nearmap (May 15, 2024) (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VIN_gt6KhaB12qPZCkseFabZmksE3o6B/view?usp=drive_link )
According to the Lyft drivers GPS tracks (https://drive.google.com/file/d/14gtiC3w4Qny90hsxmBizYiUkdKqyexEs/view?usp=sharing) and Lyft-owned street level image taken from Southbranch Boulevard at the intersection with South 27th Street 42.86738,-87.95129 (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SryBh_Wer_sQa4tVEtisw_0_DdgOCd9A/view?usp=drive_link ) is visible that the roads are opened for traffic.
Best regards!

154381938 over 1 year ago

Hello ryan_c,
I’m Anastasia. I'm an OSM communications specialist on the OSM mapping team at Lyft.
Thanks for bringing this to our attention
When we removed the construction tag, we relied on the GPS tracks from our drivers for the week prior to the changeset therefore, the data was based on tracks from approximately July 12 to July 20.
As of today (August 20), some road segments still show GPS tracks, while others do not. Unfortunately, I cannot verify the telemetry data from the time the changeset was published to confirm whether all the roads had GPS tracks when the construction tag was removed.
According to the current telemetry data and the official sources that you have linked I reverted previous changes (changeset/155507179) for several ways where no GPS tracks were presented.
I apologize for the mistake. We will be more careful when working with construction in the future.
Best regards!

133611363 over 1 year ago

Hello ZLima12,
I’m Anastasia. I'm an OSM communications specialist on the OSM mapping team at Lyft.
Thank you for your message, and for catching this error!
I understand now that if the circular traffic must yield to any entering road, it is not a roundabout but a circular.
Thanks for bringing this to our attention and correcting the inaccuracy.
Best regards!

154131470 over 1 year ago

Hi StreetSurveyor!
I’m Anastasia. I'm an OSM communications specialist on the OSM mapping team at Lyft.
Thanks for bringing this to our attention.
Based on our internal sources, the driver opted for an alternative route instead of the specified road. The latest satellite imagery did not clearly show the road, which led us to believe the map information was outdated, prompting us to remove it.
We appreciate your verification and correction of our error.
Moving forward, we will exercise greater diligence in monitoring such changes.
Best regards!

153192071 over 1 year ago

Hi,
I'm sorry, but this falls outside of my expertise. The OSM team at Lyft handles map fixes exclusively.
Best regards,
Anastasia

153192071 over 1 year ago

Hi XZH@CHD!
I’m Anastasia, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for your question.
According to the OSM wiki page, the 'ref' tags shouldn’t include cardinal directions in their values (osm.wiki/United_States_roads_tagging#:~:text=The%20name%20and%20ref%20tags%20should%20not%20contain%3A).
Instead, the cardinal direction is indicated in the route relation: e.g.relation/108619 (US 101 North) and relation/71162 (US 101 South).
So if you need to distinguish between the two one-way roads, you can refer to the route relations for the specific directions.
Best regards!

149421767 almost 2 years ago

Hi, Spaghetti Monster!
Thank you for catching and fixing that error. The ideditor I used does support warnings, but unfortunately, it went unnoticed by me.
I apologize for the mistake and will ensure to be more careful when submitting changes.
Best regards!

146628670 almost 2 years ago

Hi Udarian!
Thanks for reaching us and don't worry we are happy to help.
I've been checking this area periodically but the motorway links that you asked about are still closed for the general traffic. There is no telemetry data for way/1149564715 and way/1149564737 (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Q4W-5tJUu1sptd06mg348SIT3gzGmJeQ/view?usp=drive_link )
And about this motorway link way/1149564718 It looks like there are some drivers’ tracks (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LV6x9uX91LSVl8_Df3pqmoDDeCvAQhE-/view?usp=sharing), but they are quite poor and unfortunately there are no fresh street view images to be 100% sure that the motorway link is open.
Best regards!

148578808 almost 2 years ago

Hi Zaneo!
I’m Anastasia, an OSM communications specialist on the OSM mapping team at Lyft.
Many thanks for reaching us.
I want to assure you that the Lyft mapping team takes the OpenStreetMap rules seriously and that all of our resources are compliant with them. As "Lyft-owned aerial imagery" for now, we use Nearmap imagery. They do allow us to use their imagery for OSM edits by license. That means our evidence fully complies with the OSM requirements. This data is updated frequently, and we try to make edits based on the most recent data.
This information is in the description of my profile in the "Lyft’s-owned sources (ex.proprietary sources)" section.
Best regards!

146628670 almost 2 years ago

Hi Udarian!
Motorway links way/1149564715 and way/1149564737 are still closed, there is no telemetry data for them.
And I'm not certain about the motorway link (way/1149564718). There are rare GPS tracks on this way; it is possible that it is already open, but no strong evidence exists for now. I can double check the next week and edit this way if it will be more clear.
Best regards!

145245931 about 2 years ago

Hi Will, Happy New Year!

My name is Anastasia, and I'm Kate’s teammate. Thank you for raising this question in the OSM Slack. It is very useful to know more opinions from the OSM community members about it.

You’re right; it would be more accurate to add lane_markings=no tag in cases when there are no lane markings but the number of lanes is obvious.

Best regards!

110464056 about 2 years ago

Hi skquinn!
I’m Anastasia. I'm an OSM communications specialist on the OSM mapping team at Lyft.
Thank you for your message, and for catching this error!
Our workflow has already been modified after you contacted us for the first time regarding the placement tag (changeset/124335355)
However, even though this changeset was published earlier than when we updated the editing workflow, we will remind the team of the order of this tag to ensure that the placement tag is applied correctly.
Thank you for raising this up!
We appreciate what you've done for OSM!
Best regards!

131368350 about 2 years ago

Hi, tguen!
I’m Anastasia, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft.
Thank you for catching and correcting this error!
Please accept my apologies. I'll be more cautious when pushing changesets up.

Best wishes!

139603894 over 2 years ago

We appreciate you sharing the details and the image taken there.
I fixed the incorrect geometry in the changeset: changeset/140852518
Thank you for bringing this mistake to our attention!
I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.

139603894 over 2 years ago

Hi, Duga,
I’m Anastasia. I'm an OSM communications specialist on the OSM mapping team at Lyft.
I connected roads according to the Lyft-owned aerial image Nearmap
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1w6Pc9r-J3xB1aSVvJ22ozoMmeZlWUfF-/view?usp=sharing from March 26,2023
It is visible in the attached picture that Hickory Hollow Court adjacent to International Circle at the node node/11060752013
Please let us know if you have any information regarding these roads if they are still closed.
Best wishes!