Noted. Thanks.

Actually, I didn't. I looked at their aerial imagery, just to notice that the resolution seems to be 20th century-like.

The address nodes were already present on the Map, but placed outside the structure. So I moved them into it, leaving it to the local mapper to improve it further.

amenity=doctors is generally used for physicians. Robin Gervais is not licensed to practice in Switzerland.

Maybe addr:housenumber=* ?

Interestingly, these are already present, but with different values. Sample:

way/1531647846 has 61

node/12273172169 has 31

Indirectly, the URLs provide a reference for the entire feature, not just its names. This is not inconsistent with our key definition at url=* . Providing a reference is not the same as sourcing and generally implies multiple resources. If you are worried about long-term retrieval, there is the Internet Archive.

Is there a single resource you have in mind from which you had wanted to source and create this? Sorry if I got ahead of you.

Which part of the definition are you referring to? The picture illustrating the article might even look like the manor on that property.

The value for the key addr:country=* would generally be osm.wiki/Tag%3Aaddr%3Acountry%3DCO

The value for addr:country=* would generally be addr:country=IT

What's the reasoning behind the removal of service=driveway from these access roads?

I created it directly at node/13961838365

I added the URLs to provide verifyability for how this exclave is named.

There is no official website and the region is not present in swissNAMES3D, so I used several relevant pages that document those naming variants, including different names across Buchberg's website. They provide long-term, checkable references.

relation/1687206 was created by another mapper.

I'm open to adjusting the tagging approach to better match OSM guidance for storing multiple references.

Pour ce type de modification récurrente, serait-ce possible d'ajouter au résumé le/les pays concernés (la France, j'imagine) ?

Ou de limiter l'étendue géographique des changeset ?

Yes, that helps, thanks. On a separate node (POI) for you, that URL could be in url=* .

To indicate that its within the centre, maybe
addr:unit=* = Aliotis
addr:floor=* = 2
would do.

This should provide a minium level of verifiability and could work for similar POIs.

BTW, in my view, you could include your personal name in name=* . There is also contact:facebook=* contact:instagram=* contact:linkedin=* . Personally, I'd avoid including an email, but it's up to you.

Notice: This comment may be spell-checked and proofread with various tools. It does reflect the views of myself or those mentioned.

node/13285536907 is the same as node/12124115850

I'm sorry you feel that way.

Please avoid blindly repeating to others what you may have heard about your own approach.

If you lecture people about rules, you should know why you do so.

@GartenStuhl: it's a way Taktaal made their argument (indeed unrelated to my original response) and re-reading it, you are right, what they wrote could be understood as yes. So we can close that point.

To your other point: I don't let AI answer on my behalf. Also, this was not an "automated edit". Both accusations should not be repeated. Can we hear if there was any issue with the content of my original response? If don't want to participate fixing these relations, maybe you are just in the wrong CS.

The edit wasn't automated, but maybe it falls in an OSM category of "automated edits". I will check.

On the side note: I'm still curious: Are you frequently being told that you are rude?

It would be helpful for myself and other readers if you made a substantive argument about this discussion. Are there points in my initial response that you find are not clear? Please do use spellchecker and AI if you can't make it without. I added the list of fixes for stations to osm.wiki/Switzerland/Parcoursvita#Fixes_for_stations . Please help improve it.

@Taktaal: This seems to be unrelated to this changeset or its discussion. Is there anything of substance you want to say about this changeset or its discussion? On a side node: are you frequently being told that you are rude?

For osm.wiki/Tag:name=, the question is how it's actually spelled on the ground.

How it must be spelled in Quebec or Paris doesn't matter. OSMOSE's spelling checks in Geneva are generally problematic, or by its own terminology just "bad". I don't think you should adopt OSMOSE's wording when commenting on other mappers.

I will try to find my survey and update it if needed.

It seems it's the spelling used by the hotel on its website.