https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |
I think the question might be if a viaduct structure can be considered a building (too?) when it is used as such. Not saying the tagging is perfect here, some parts are inconsistent and should be definitively bridge only, but most of what is tagged here as building is walled off and used for shops, restaurants, companies, etc. Some of it more extensively and openly used as others that look disused or are unidentifiable. It's not just fundament or cavities, although you might say that these cavities are just walled off. (You may have looked it up, but I will link a picture to a similiar part of the Berliner Stadtbahn viaduct close to Jannowitzbrücke regardless: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Regional_train_on_Stadtbahn_viaduct.jpg)
see also my comment in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1309952
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Berlin/Stadtbahnb%C3%B6gen though that is more about addressing than building-type.
I am planning to retag all ways in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3563707 that are building=yes into building=viaduct, following schema of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96837199
Should I also add man_made=bridge? In some cases e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/574155314 it is tagged as both, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96837199 doesn't have man_made.
I am leaning towards not adding man_made if not already set. Does anyone feel strongly that we should have man_made=bridge _as well as_ building=viaduct?
Please let me know if you are opposed.
Concerning the address-import: The address-data further strengthens the argument for these viaducts being regarded as buildings.Also with the import Polarbear adjusted some of the bridges that had an unfitting building tag attached to them. That should be cleaned up for now.
//
building=viaduct is fitting but man_made=bridge might even be conflicting in that regard so I would argue for not including it. For the part at the Zentralwerkstatt, I actually don't know that particular section, so no idea what to make of it.
I (finally) made an edit to retag building=yes to building=viaduct as discussed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61147002
Could you review and see if it looks alright?
Looks good, thank you Jarek.
If there is anything left, feel free to reopen. But for now I think all has been said and the whole Berliner Stadtbahn tagging has been hugely improved. Thanks to everyone. :)