Changeset: 123611516
Shandong 山东省 清理[highway=road]
Closed by 喵耳引力波
Tags
changesets_count | 1188 |
---|---|
created_by | iD 2.21.1 |
host | https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit |
imagery_used | Maxar Premium Imagery |
locale | zh-CN |
resolved:almost_junction:highway-highway | 1 |
resolved:close_nodes:vertices | 1 |
resolved:crossing_ways:highway-highway | 1 |
resolved:missing_tag:highway_classification | 37 |
Discussion
-
Comment from danieldegroot2
请把 "F**k DWG "部分从你的资料中删除。尊重你的志愿者伙伴/贡献者。这包括DWG。该信息可能被认为是不恰当的,不管你是否审查了一个不恰当的词或打算把它作为一个笑话。
任何人都可以在你的修改集上发表评论,例如询问你所使用的标签是什么意思。这样,其他贡献者可以了解你正在做什么修改,以及你为什么要这样做。
如果你认为一个评论是不恰当的,请向DWG报告。
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group#I.27ve_seen_a_problem.3B_what_should_I_do.3F如果你认为你受到了DWG的不公正对待,请参见
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group#I_feel_that_I_have_been_treated_unfairly_by_DWG--
Hey 喵耳引力波 ,
Remove the "F**k DWG" section from your profile, please. Respect your fellow volunteers / contributors. This includes the DWG. The message may be considered inappropriate, regardless if you censor an inappropriate word or intend it as a joke.
Anyone can comment on your changeset to for example ask what a tag you are using means. This way, other contributors can understand what changes you are making and why you are making them.
If you think a comment is inappropriate, report it to the DWG;
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group#I.27ve_seen_a_problem.3B_what_should_I_do.3FIf you think you have been treated unfairly by DWG, see
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group#I_feel_that_I_have_been_treated_unfairly_by_DWGRegards,
Daniel
-
Comment from 喵耳引力波
Hey Daniel
Thank you for noticing this and talk with me. Actually this is not me treated unfairly by DWG, but the honorable "on the ground" rule unfairly treated by some DWG member.
Thank you for listen this long story.
As we all know, the terrirory disputed area should follow the on the ground rule, no matter which one is seen adjective or evil.
Here are 2 changeset:
+ https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111484120
+ https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111486876The disputed changeset related on a boundary change between Bhutan-China, in this area a small viliage can been seen on satelite map. This places is now controled by China, if some one search the "Pangda viliage" on google he/she will immediately know everything.
But DWG just "invastigating" and "invastigating", without any result, just let this area locked, and add strange tag: "fixme=What's this".
If something related to China, usually it will cost a long long long period time to handle than other place. Even some DWG member show there injustice about China mapper.
> In a twist to usual OSM rules (“local mappers know best”), in order to give Chinese users the best map, it might be best if citizens of China refrained from editing anything of international interest (including China’s borders) - or really anything their own government might have an opinion on.
This part of quote is from woodpack said in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/assanges/diary/397559 (Also you can see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ztzthu/diary/397732 , this is a pair of diary). He show the prejudice of seeing every China mapper as a governmental dominated tool person.
I don't think they will give justice about the fact, maybe the fact don't be care at all, them just want to use those changeset to show their aititude about China.
----
Utill the issue handle was taken equal between China and other places, utill they finished the so-called "invastigate" according to currently situation and on the ground fact, I will NOT change my f-word.
Even DWG can block me, can kick me off OSM, but on the ground fact will not change. I respect every mapper contributing in OSM, even they are doing unproper edit or making some mistake, I think this can be handled in a peaceful way. But acted as admin, acted as part of DWG, they, at least those 2 DWG member handle this issue, lost the justice.
If my word is offensive, those admin's inaction and prejudice is also offensive to all hardworking and disciplined China mapper. I can't bare this.
I don't want to larger this to all DWG member, but at least, on this issue, I don't think they right.
That's why I want to FUCK DWG (No cencored, it is FUCK)
-
Comment from 喵耳引力波
If you have some method can let this so-called investigate speed fast and make things clearly, I thank you sincerely. ♥
-
Comment from GSF1200S
DWG还没“调查”完么?
- 1078517987, v1
- 1078517988, v1
- 1078517989, v1
- 1078517990, v1
- 1078517991, v1
- 1078517992, v1
- 大学路 (202320107), v20
- 385199451, v5
- 385199453, v12
- 385199456, v5
- 385199457, v6
- 385199462, v7
- 386274800, v5
- 386276292, v3
- 386276293, v5
- 菏泽学院(北校区)正门 (386276455), v5
- 386277641, v3
- 386277642, v2
- 386277643, v2
- 386277644, v2
Relations (1)
Nodes (1-20 of 40)
- 1
- 2
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |