Changeset: 119400601
reverted changeset 105987865, contributor had displaced everything, some specific tag edits were kept, positions enhanced
Closed by SHARCRASH
Tags
created_by | reverter_plugin/35893;JOSM/1.5 (18387 en) |
---|---|
source | openstreetmap.lu "mapper’s delight" hillshade lidar 2019 with unclassified points |
Discussion
-
Comment from SomeoneElse
Re https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119400601 ,
It is not OK to revert another user's changeset if that was made in good faith, without any sort of discussion with that user.
Did you have any sort of discussion where they said it was OK for you to revert it?
-
Comment from SHARCRASH
It is OK when most of the elements are wrong. The contributor even displaced the country's borderland. Even if it's just a few meters, i find this being a serious mistake. Though as i said in my changeset, it was not a full revert, i kept the tag changes and some railway network enhancements. There are still some errors from previous contributors dating from 2014 (name mistake). I already dedicate my time in correcting many errors, so it's legit i try to use the easiest method to restore accurate data.
Even if i used the revert, it doesn't mean I'm in conflict with the contributor. I do have faith and realise his edits were done with good intent. Though the mistakes were done and someone needed to correct them.
I warned him, explained him how I identified the errors and informed him of more precise sources in our country.
It's funny how once again when we compare the efforts of moderation done over me with the ones done over tomolobla, the DWG didn't care that he lied to me in saying that the features didn't exit anymore and didn't care about much data being deleted, whereas i told woodpeck that they do and i've proven they do exist. He was just so full of himself to admit he was wrong afterwards i presented him the proofs. On your side, you let yourself being influenced by past moderation from a moderator who possibly has some qualities but has also big flaws, doesn't admit them and couldn't present a conclusion with an investigation although there are two DWG members in Luxembourg.
-
Comment from SomeoneElse
Re "I warned him", how exactly did you do that.
Also - please try to reply with a simple factual answer that doesn't include any ad-hominem attacks on other OSM community members, whether they be DWG members or not. -
Comment from SHARCRASH
My comment was as simple as possible in order to defend myself and totally factual. I described facts that happened and there is data to prove it. I didn't write all that text by pure masochism.
So, don't tell me how i should express myself, as long as i don't insult people freely and/or i don't lie. I'm not that kind of person. I have the right to express myself as i see fit since I am concerned.
-
Comment from SomeoneElse
I asked 2 questions and haven't had an answer yet. They were:
"Did you have any sort of discussion where they said it was OK for you to revert it?"
and
"Re 'I warned him', how exactly did you do that?" -
Comment from SHARCRASH
Yes you had answer, read my previous comment. What you're doing is harassment or do you have a short term memory? If this is the case, it's common behaviour to read what has been discussed already. Apparently you don't want, you keep contacting me and repeating, hence harassment! This is becoming a serious matter, Andy!
How: via message... obviously!
-
Comment from SomeoneElse
"How: via message... obviously!"
Thanks, but that's absolutely not obvious. There are dozens of ways that OSM mappers can discuss things, and an OSM private message is just one.
I'd actually suggest changeset disccussion comments (like this one) is a better option because it means other people familiar with the area can comment too. -
Comment from SHARCRASH
I agree it is better to contact on changesets but it's not forbidden to contact via private message and it's not forbidden for any contributor to revert a changeset if the data has been tampered!
Ways (1-20 of 28)
- 1
- 2
- Train 1900 (26612514), v19
- Minièresbunn (32612595), v20
- Minièresbunn (32612634), v23
- Minièresbunn (32612641), v13
- 166349645, v27
- 279532813, v10
- 279532815, v9
- Minièresbunn (279680626), v10
- Quai Miniersbunn (281663098), v12
- Minnièresbunn (281663102), v12
- 281907531, v6
- 281909756, v10
- Minièresbunn (317295577), v11
- 339174360, v13
- Minièresbunn (368363014), v15
- Minnièresbunn (368759371), v9
- Minièresbunn (430948618), v7
- Minnièresbunn (430948620), v7
- Parc Industriel et Ferroviaire du Fond-de-Gras (638481429), v10
- 688242661, v7
Relations (1)
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |