I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
OpenStreetMap
Discussion
Comment from Vincent de Phily on 19 May 2020 at 11:39
Why restrict yourself ? There are other sources at our disposal, and Bing isn’t always the best.
Comment from gecho111 on 22 May 2020 at 01:03
I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
Comment from jimkats on 24 May 2020 at 12:03
Bing’s aerial imagery is outdated and low quality. I usually cross-check with Google’s aerial imagery which is higher quality and more recent.