Bonjour Marc,
en général I prends les noms comme affichés à BD Carthage (le TMS dans JOSM). Pour l'aqueduc, BD Carthage affiche le nom "Aqueduc de la Dhuis". Pour la rivière, aussi, le nom est avec "i", sauf le cours supérieure qui, selon BD Carthage, s'appele "ravin de la Dhuys". Concernant la rivière, j'ai créé uniquement la rélation, et je n'ai pas osé de changer tous le noms de tronçons déja existants. J'ai utilizé "Dhuis" comme nom de rélation et ajouté un alt_name pour Dhuys. C'est vrai, on pourrait dire que ça c'est un peu inconsistant.
Cordialement, Franz

Hallo wiesengras, ich hatte vor einiger Zeit die Baustelle des neuen Altenheims in Weil der Stadt als Baugebiet (landuse=construction) gemapped. Habe jetzt gesehen, dass Du das ganze Gebiet in ein Haus (building=yes) geändert hast. Das ist m.E. nicht richtig. Auf dem Baugebiet werden zwei Häuser erstellt. Die habe ich noch nicht gemapped, solange die Baustelle da ist, weil ich das sonst nicht genau genug machen kann. Wenn die Baustelle weg ist, sollte das Gebiet zu landuse=residential werden (plus die beiden Häuser mit building=yes). Ich würde das wieder zurück ändern. Lass mich wissen, wenn Du meine Ansicht nicht richtig findest. Viele Grüße, wuff57

Hallo PT-53, die Straße von Weil der Stadt nach Ostelsheim, die ja wegen des Brückenneubaus gesperrt war, ist weiterhin gesperrt. Habe es heute am Kreisel in WDS verifiziert. Viele Grüße

Hello Alexandre148025, I noticed that the course of Ruisseau de Château Renaud that you introduced, does not match with what BD Carthage/Sandre shows. BD Carthage lets this ruisseau start at node/667956694, the upstream waterways 671581269 and 671581272 do not have a name. The corresponding Sandre ID U2611120 starts with the Bief des Laizines. I did not want to remove the name from 671581269 and 671581272, without prior checking with you, based on which source you named these two ways as Ruisseau de Château Renaud.
Cheers, wuff57

No problem if you change to the breton name (Ar Skav). Besides the name tag, keep the French name (name:fr) and specify the breton as name:br as well.

Hi, I just noticed that you removed all attributes of way/41864958, making it a dummy way. Was previously landuse=farmland which looks appropriate. Can you check what happen? Did you want to put this into a multipolygon and forgot to add it to the multipolygon? Cheers, wuff57

What happened was that the original Scave waterway pointed (upstream) to the wrong direction, so I split it (which made me the owner of 561802752). But I forgot to remove the name of that section. Anyway, I corrected it.

I think the name "le Scave" for way/561802752#map=16/47.8451/-3.4645 is simply wrong. May have been my mistake. This waterway is part of J5124200 for which BD Cartage does not show a name, not for the Sandre ID nor for the section. way/243894623 is part of J5124000.

Hello trial, let me explain, what I did: I used the TMS for BD Carthage in JOSM and tried to stick to the "offical" names. BD Carthage/Sandre uses sometimes different names for the Sandre ID and for the sections of a river. The name for J5124000 is "le Scaff" (see http://www.sandre.eaufrance.fr/geo/CoursEau/J5124000). In the BD Carthage overlay, however, each section is called "le Scave". So, I used the name for the Sandre ID as name for the relation and the section names as waterway names and added it as alt_name in the relation. You have the local knowledge, which I don't have, so if you feel that "le Scave" is more appropriate as relation name, I have no problem if you change it. Cheers, wuff57

Bonjour Stakhan, I've just noticed that you deleted the relation/5877050, which covered l'Ousson (waterway). Was there any specific reasons why you did this, or was this just an error? Cheers, wuff57

Hallo Bergmaus, habe gerade gesehen, dass Du zwei Wege (95588616, 95588558) gelöscht hast, die Teil eines beschilderten Wanderwegs des Schwarzwaldvereins sind. Ich bin die Wegstücke vor ca. 1 Jahr selbst gegangen. Wenn das jetzt wirklich abgesperrte Privatwege sind, ist dann der Wanderweg neu beschildert worden? Jetzt existiert dort eine Lücke im Mapping des Wanderwegs. Viele Grüße, wuff57

Hi, BD Carthage calls the waterway you named "Ruissaut du Lavoir de Gaillon", "Ru du Canal", so I wonder where you got the name from and which name would be correct.

I'm trying to ensure that all French rivers (in Europe) that are described in Wikipedia are mapped in OSM. I'm aware that the Cebuano wiki entries provide only minimal information. For rivers that have wiki entries in the French wiki I of course link to the French entry. So, the rivers that I link to the Ceb wiki only have entries in that wiki, not in French or another language.

Hallo Hoda, ich war gerade in Altenburg, und die Mönchsgasse ist noch immer nicht passierbar. Das Tor im oberen Drittel ist verschlossen, und der Eingang von der Frauengasse ist nicht möglich, habe ihn zumindest nicht gefunden. Ich würde den Weg ab dem Tor bis zur Frauengasse löschen, außer Du weisst, dass sich an dem Zustand bald was ändert. Viele Grüße, wuff57

Hi yaugenka,
I don't have strong opinions about the name. name=Ruisseau did not disturb me, so I left it. Be aware that some of the waterways that were mapped by Captain47, don't even have a Sandre ID.
Having ways with the tributary role is just the tip of the iceberg of potential inconsistencies. I have seen lakes and riverbanks as part of type=waterway relations, sometimes with a role "riverbank", sometimes without a role. I just came across relation/357319 (for the Nagold in Germany). It contains at the end riverbanks without a role and I think they prevent that your program recognizes the Nagold as an affluent of the Enz. Unless editors like JOSM enforce stricter rules, there will always be some weird mapping which may influence programs that evaluate the data.

Hi yaugenka,
confusing side_streams and tributaries is a common problem with French waterways in OSM. Sometimes I corrected it, sometimes not. The tributary role generates a warning in JOSM, but tributary is widely used with French rivers. I did not add tributaries myself, but for existing tributaries I sometimes put longer waterways into a relation and added the relation as tributary instead of individual waterways. So, you could change the side_streams into tributaries, but I would not delete them from the relation.

There are many (smaller) waterways which don't have a name in BD Carthage (the French waterway database). Sometimes there is no name tag in the relation, but often the Sandre ID (the 8-char code) is used as name as well. name=Ruisseau is not widely used. I don't like it too much, but I would leave it.

Hi Captain47, could you check relations 8722779 and 8722781? They contain the same waterways, but the destination is different. It looks as if you included the wrong waterways in 8722781.

You mentioned BD Carthage for the distinction between waterway=stream vs. river. I only have a rough understanding of BD Carthage. I'm grateful if you could tell me where exactly this can be found. I am only aware of the CLASSE field which expresses the length of the "cours d'eau", while "stream" and "river" are rather about the width of the waterway.

It just occurred to me that you may be referring to the difference between waterway=stream and waterway=river. The French OSM wiki is not really specific about it. The English version is more specific: "the commonly accepted rule for OpenStreetMap is that a stream can be jumped across by an active, able-bodied person", but still there is a lot of judgement when you base your mapping on satellite pictures.

Not sure what you are refering to, as I made a number of changes in this change set. If you mean the course of l'Elnon: I used the BD Carthage layer in JOSM. Please check also the note that I added in the relation. If you meant something else, please give me a specific way as an example.