What are the next steps here?
And here? changeset/147054398

Please, read OSM wiki about coastlines before editing them. You broke the connectivity.

To clarify, they are connected, but not only these mentioned ways. If we are going to follow the logic with permissive and access, we need to review and retag all the nearby ways. Otherwise, routing will work not as expected, finding strange detours. It is also discussed here changeset/147106612

It should be reverted from my perspective.

Broken not only shuttle access roads, but not connected with the shuttle highways:

way/27495887
way/27850252

Reverts breaking routing changes.
See the discussion in changeset/133837637 for more details.

Well, I took the liberty of reverting it: changeset/147198870

Wait until routing engines will update their data.

OSRM, Graphhopper and Valhalla are not working here for almost a year since this particular changeset where we are writing comments :)

All the Eurotunnel service roads are already mapped as foot=no, bicycle=no, horse=no, etc. access=no is strange.

What value do your changes give?

I ask on osm-gb community, they are also agree that =permissive is odd here.

1. access=no may technically be used to include eg foot=no , but semantically it's not nice for showing something that doesn't apply as a whole to the general public. If needed, using foot= or motor_vehicle= alone is better.
2. motor_vehcle=permissive is a very common possible mistake . It doesn't mean by "permission" , "permit" , or whatever else. It has a very specific meaning. If everyone can pay to get in, it is considered =yes .

I already wrote you in other comments. Your changes are controversial. Especially access=no. Please, talk to the local UK community first.

And why motor_vehicle=permissive is better here? Why premissive?

Hm, so you select motor_vehicle=permissive, and iD editor puts access=no itself?

Why do you put access=no everywhere?

So, the whole LeMans shuttle infra now has access=no? It is not working at all?

Is this article about settlement or municipality?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barcelona

Before: it is available via Node -> Q1492 -> wiki entries
After: ...

Or make hierarchy Q31913048 (city) -> Q1492 (municipality) -> Q249489 (metropolitan)

Ok, it all makes sense when all these wikidata refs will be filled with valid wiki page references (not one strange language). Now my pipeline is broken because I've lost wiki pages for Barcelona. And I suspect the same thing with others OSM data consumers ..

What is it then Q33146843 ?

So, this Q1492 data is about "municipality"?
And this empty data Q31913048 is about "city"?

nonsense ..

And again, if we are going to be consistent here, why Relation and Node have the same wikipedia entry, but different wikidata entries?