Thank you. I often drive past here, but haven't got round to stopping and surveying the area properly.

This change adds two separate features for Lees Brook Mill so in the spirit of osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element I have merged them in changeset/162478933

Thank you for adding the building outline: it looks like this duplicates the Aldi that already exists at node/11351112076

As I mentioned on note/3988550 I was unsure of the building's exact shape when I mapped the supermarket as a node.

It's probably best to delete the older node and move its tags onto the newer way you added rather than duplicating information: osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Thank you for your prolific work on OpenStreetMap, but please don't add duplicate information.

This change adds a node node/12303973241 that duplicates node/12303973241

You also added node/12303973299 while removing useful information from way/1112048603

In both cases, Aldi and B&M occupy the whole building, so tagging the way provides a more helpful description than adding a node that covers a small part of the way.

I'm fairly sure there is both a Barnardo's and Matalan here, so I'm unsure your fix describes what's on the ground accurately.

I have noted this at note/4590104

Thank you for fixing this, and similar with Greenfield nearby.

Like Uppermill, Greenfield is not a suburb of Oldham, so many of these changes seem unhelpful.

Tagging Uppermill as a suburb of Oldham seems weird. Uppermill is a distinct village, part of Saddleworth, traditionally in Yorkshire, whereas Oldham is traditionally in Lancashire.

Uppermill, like other Saddleworth villages, is part of the borough of Oldham and has Oldham as its postal town, but it is in no meaningful way a suburb.

Thank you for your helpful work improving the map. When you add sidewalks to the map, for example way/337782565, it is helpful to also add the sidewalk=separate tag to the corresponding road, for example way/255565308, as described in osm.wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_separate_way

Thank you for spotting my mistake: I have visited Slaithwaite a few times, but I can easily believe I misremembered this. I really appreciate you fixing the problem and letting me know.

Happy New Year to you too!

This changeset adds an obelisk at node/11279248206 right next to an existing monument at node/1845277943 - are these the same thing or are there really two separate monuments right next to each other?

You have mapped the house "Westview Bungalow" as two separate houses at way/712004822 and way/1328224519 but I'm sure there's only one house here, not two separate houses with the same name.

OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, not for adding imaginary things.

I'm going to delete this, and the "Beornen Settlement" you added in a different changeset because I'm sure they don't exist, but please let me know if you believe I have made a mistake.

way/479672089 is now tagged as bridge=yes and ford=yes but it seems unlikely both a bridge and a ford exist here. Instead of using common sense it would help to map what exists here on the ground.

Please follow the recommended approach for bilingual names described at osm.wiki/Wales#Welsh_names

I have reverted this change in changeset/158575506 for the reasons mentioned on note/2087778

Thank you for helping to improve the map.

I notice the restaurant named "Lilienblum" has a house name "Passo Restaurant". Is there one restaurant here, and if so what is its name, or do both exist nearby?

I'm happy to help if you like, and I hope we can make the map better reflect what currently exists here.

Thank you for your work on the map: it's always good to see people contributing.

You have added a "name" and "house name" of "Passo restaurant" to a five storey building, which is not tagged as a restaurant: way/630379337

However, there is a restaurant named "Lilenblum" which also has the house name "Passo Restaurant": node/12250584314

Don't worry about making mistakes - it's easily done - but I'm happy to help fix things if you let me know what you were aiming for.

Thanks again for your useful mapping and help: I passed here earlier today and added more detail in changeset/158015296

Thank you, that's really helpful. I walk past here regularly so I'll look carefully next time I'm here and see if I can find a way to tag the feature more descriptively.

I like how different mappers focus on different things, and so notice different details to map. There's always lots new to learn!