Do you mind if I remove those path names and add them into hiking path relation?

I wonder why you did put access=no for all these footpaths around here... Hmm.

For example: way/546836024

Thank you so much for adding this bicycle route of Vrhnika!

Thank you so much for adding this hiking route: relation/17618381. I hiked it today and it was beautiful.

Do you know what was the route that was marked with red sun on yellow background?

OK, thanks. I resolved that and added other neighbourhoods as subareas to the Vrhnika town.

Hey Martin. I realized that you added this residential area with a name a year before I added neighbourhood point here. I was thinking that maybe this name "Janezova vas" probably belongs to the neighborhood more than the residential area, that could be several inside neoghbourhood... What do you think about having a neighbourhood relation like this: changeset/149243221

Hey! I don't know any official sources either, but we simply call this hill like this. The hill is an attraction I'd say, since it really stands out.

Liels paldies!

This change, which added an address as a housename "Riepu serviss" is a bit weird. Is it correct? way/1080496873/history

Honestly, I cannot tell which one is better, since I dont have dual-band GPS device. But the custom map I am using is an official aerophoto map that was published by Tbilisi administration http://maps.tbilisi.gov.ge

Thank you so much for your Tbilisi edits, Yusuf! Maybe you'll find pleasure editing, while using this much more detailed layer from Tbilisi government :) Just add it to your Custom layer in map editor :)

http://mapstiles.tbilisi.gov.ge/tbilisimap-tileserver/tilesproxy?x={https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:x}&y={y}&z={z}&l=image2020-v2&t=50000

Czesc! Moja babcia tutaj mieszka. Dziekuje bardzo za pomoc z karta, przyjaciele! Bardzo mi milo!

Please, remove this change.

It was a mistake, please delete this edit.

Ta iela ir joprojam slegta un tur ir remonts. Es tulit atzimesu kura posma ir jau gatavs.

Thank you a lot for your edits!

Great! Thank you very much to you!

Do you have an idea why these borders do no match? relation/11300446#map=13/41.8017/44.7156

(compare Tbilisi border with Saburtalo district border)

Wikidata demands to link only to relation, because ways and points are not stable enough. But you deleted relations and moved all tags to ways, which is a wrong approach.

Besides this, how to mark administrative boundaries is written in OSM wiki (boundary=administrative).

Here's an example: relation/11898665#map=14/41.7109/44.7668

There is a relation with boundary=administrative and two parts of relation: 1) a simple enclosed way (with no tags or information) and with role=outer and 2) a label (with the name of this administrative division).

Do you mind, if I restore those relations, move back needed tags, setup linking between OSM and Wikidata? Or you can do it yourself? Thank you for understanding.

Hi, why did you remove wikidata and all boundary tags from these relations? We need it (the data you deleted) to draw districts in Wikivoyage.

Hi, Irakli. According to highway=bus_guideway, bus guideways are are those roads which have bus lane SEPARATED from main road. If those are just usual bus lanes, then you cannot be tagged as guideways.