OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
102718135 over 4 years ago

Cosa c'era di problematico da correggere?

102756255 over 4 years ago

Questa relazione ha raggiunto proporzioni assurde e sono finiti nell'area forestale paesi interi...

102071114 over 4 years ago

Tagging from the wiki falls a bit short here. A feature like this, with buildings and other infrastructure, cannot be mapped with leisure=pitch as a main tag, like a stadium can't. The mapped leisure=pitch is just one part of the facility.

102071114 over 4 years ago

This is the whole area of the model aerodrome. The actual "pitch" is mapped on this object:
relation/6028601

Revert please

101102853 over 4 years ago

Non lo sappiamo se le strade sono intitolate a Enrico Berlinguer e Alcide De Gasperi.
Comunque quelle sono solo linee guida. Vorrei conoscere almeno una fonte, che sia un cartello stradale, una delibera del comune o qualcuno che usa questi nomi prima di cambiarli. In ogni caso i nomi attuali sono validi e non vanno eliminati ma eventualmente spostati in short_name.
Ciao

101735128 over 4 years ago

Grazie, ho guardato meglio e ho visto che hai mantenuto la parte che arriva alla casa abbandonata.
Quando c'è un cartello di divieto di accesso su strada privata ti consiglio di usare access=private invece di access=no. Quest'ultimo è molto estremo e significa che neanche i proprietari possono accedere.
Ciao

101102853 over 4 years ago

Ciao. Via Berlinguer l'ho ripristinato perché sembra la via di si chiami così.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=HaWculxwAvA5QPvnpK5eoA&lat=43.23271820997243&lng=13.602287065488554&z=16.64085359878859&x=0.28648856671692347&y=0.4269561671468231&zoom=1.7578125

Per Via De Gasperi hai una fonte per l'aggiunta del nome?

100057900 over 4 years ago

Hi.
Is the name you entered the name of a building?

101735128 over 4 years ago

Ciao.
Parte della traccia che hai eliminato è visibile in foto. Puoi spiegare la cancellazione?

101503248 almost 5 years ago

This is correct. OSM Carto style doesn't render building:part elements. Adding a building tag to them for this reason is tagging for the renderer.

But other than that, it is incorrect because this creates buildings inside other buildings. That's why building:part tag exist.

101503248 almost 5 years ago

No SekeRob, you are reading it wrong. building and building:part tags can not coexist on the same area.
The meaning is, for every building there is only one building=* tagged area and optionally more building:part=* tagged areas.

Lorenzo

100988465 almost 5 years ago

Access restrictions must reflect the legal restrictions imposed by the appropriate signs. If there are physical limitations they can be mapped but you cannot enter restrictions at your judgment. Drivers are always responsible for where they go.
Are you mapping from a survey?

100999292 almost 5 years ago

I sentieri erano già mappati, compresa la relazione per il percorso CAI 144, che adesso è 344.
Elimino le tracce ricalcate che hai inserito.

Ciao

100988465 almost 5 years ago

Is the sign really an access restriction? I think it's just an indication and doesn't imply a prohibition for other vehicles really.

100988465 almost 5 years ago

Access permissions like these do not allow motorcycle traffic. Are you sure?
way/866061708

I don't think access=no is a good idea here.

100721297 almost 5 years ago

The two email addresses are different. One is normal and the other is certified email.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certified_email
Discussion about tagging is ongoing on talk-it mailing list

100721297 almost 5 years ago

It was actually intentional. Nothing to repair.

100639051 almost 5 years ago

Ho messo Via Battisti come short_name.
Ciao

100553105 almost 5 years ago

Thank you very much!

100553105 almost 5 years ago

Hello.
Please do not realign with Bing. I find Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta a good choice as images in general. There is also PCN 2006 - Italy, which is considered always a good source as for alignment in Italy.

Cheers