Hi user_5359,

Thanks for pointing this out. That tag was somehow inadvertently added to that grass polygon. I will go ahead and remove it.

Correction: Source used was Esri World Imagery; Mapillary

Correction: Source used was Maxar satellite imagery via MGP Pro 2025-08-29

Correction: Source used was Maxar satellite imagery via MGP Pro 2025-08-29

Hola AgusQui,
Gracias por la sugerencia de etiquetado, lo tendré en cuenta. Veo que ya has realizado las modificaciones aquí, así que diferiré tus cambios.

Hi ayowyoqrjjmwi, thank you for the response and for understanding. I think that the additional pedestrian infrastructure you added on Paseo de la Reforma looks great. I agree that the pedestrian mapping could be expanded in this area and look forward to your future additions.

Hi mariotomo,

Thank you for the comment. I noticed that in aerial imagery both way/604088797 and way/866095449 had a wider corridor and appeared to be a drivable road so I changed the classification to residential. I changed the other roads here to path where the road becomes more narrow and it looks like there may be a surface type change.

Hi Mariotomo, thanks for the updates. I agree with your changes. Happy Mapping!

Hi mariotomo, Thanks for reaching out. I originally removed this way because it was previously mapped as residential road area feature not connected to any drivable road network. It makes sense that it could be a pedestrian area with connecting paths here. I will undelete the feature way/780287926, reclassify it and add in the missing paths in the area. Thanks again and have a good day.

Hi muralito,

Thanks for reaching out. It looks like this road was very recently changed to a oneway based on the Mapillary from March 1st 2023. The image linked below shows a one-way sign: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=690183309522553

Hello ayowyoqrjjmwi. I noticed that you removed some footways around Avenida Insurgentes Sur (such as way/1150003754) but also added foot=no tags to connecting residential roads (way/24696958 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24696866) that have ground imagery showing footways on either side (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=19.430086135864&lng=-99.159622192383&z=17&pKey=927124191457589&focus=photo&x=0.4409720536185222&y=0.6139673900184565&zoom=0.002881844380403458).

In my opinion having dedicated footways modeled in such a wide and busy intersection of Avenida Insurgentes Sur is best since there are visible and prominent crosswalks across them and the OSM wiki encourages this practice (footway=crossing). Do you agree? If so, I would like to revisit this area, add missing footways and correct the tagging. Thank you.

Hola, Salve100, notamos que cambiaste way/1100718244 a "highway=pedestrian" y "oneway=no". ¿Ha cambiado recientemente a una carretera bidireccional?

Por ejemplo, en Maxar Premium Imagery parece que hay una línea de alto en todo lo ancho de la carretera cerca de este nodo node/10073922104 que indica que debería ser un sentido único en dirección oeste.

ESRI World (Clarity) muestra que se trata de una carretera muy transitada con muchos vehículos, que parecía ser modelada correcta en highway=secondary Este camino no es principalmente para peatones?, o es un camino muy transitado para vehículos?