OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
49788660 over 8 years ago

Здравствуйте, Incendium,

Я не понимаю, почему Вы разделили бул. Васил Левски на две. Он же есть один булвеард, не раделен как магистраль. Нет барьера посреди улицы. Есть двойная сплошная, но бсе такий там только одна улица.

Более того Вы не изменили теги существующей линии, так что сейчас нарушенные автобусние линии, поворотные полосы, и тротуары.

Мне кажется, лучше здесь использовать только одну линию. И легче будет. Как Вы думаете?

50092495 over 8 years ago

Привет, Стоян,

Бих искал да поясня дали този магазин за велосипеди съществува. На уеб сайта им (http://www.bike-house.biz/) е посочен този адрес, както на фейсбук страницата им е предоставена тази снимка от месец май (https://www.facebook.com/BikeHouseBikes/photos/a.512555058828421.1073741835.477582338992360/1332557426828176/?type=3&theater), на която се вижда магазинът.

Но не съм бил на място, заради това бих искал да го потвърдите.

46993960 over 8 years ago

No problem, just thought I'd flag it up. Thanks for your cleanup efforts.

46993960 over 8 years ago

Hello, you removed area=yea on a highway=pedestrian way (383174579), which made it appear as a loop when it's an open space. I'm guessing that wasn't intended? Cheers.

49227923 over 8 years ago

That makes sense. I think I'll start removing it from stops that I've surveyed. Thanks.

49247510 over 8 years ago

Hi Mike,

The path is not suitable for the unsuspecting commuter, because it has regular deep grooves in it (for rain water channeling I think?), which is why I tagged it that way -- it's not for cycling unless you're into it as a sport.

I think I'll just remove the tag. I don't know what the legal status of cycling here is.

49227923 over 8 years ago

Yeah, I've been wondering about that. I usually check the stop's name and location (and its existence), but I don't check any of the several other tags from the NaPTAN import. Does that still count as the stop being naptan:verified? I couldn't find a definition anywhere of what the criteria are for naptan:verified=yes.

Is that what others do, just remove the tag once you've confirmed the stop exists?

48918947 over 8 years ago

Привет Squiffy,

Забелязах, че сте променили категоризирането на административните граници. Това беше обсъждано във форума, но никога не се стигна до решение. Мисля, че ще е полезно, ако се включите в дискусията и ни информирате за нанесените промени:

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=27683

48528657 over 8 years ago

Привет Incendium,

(Можете на русском ответить)

I think parallel ways should only be used when the two sides of the road are physically separated, e.g. like this: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:IMG_2238_-_Clara_Barton_Pkwy_at_NSWC_(looking_east).JPG

There's been a lot of discussion of this and this seems to be the consensus: https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aopenstreetmap.org%20dual%20carriageway

Also, please notice bus line relations: this changeset broke bus 102: relation/536928#map=18/42.67461/23.30594

Всего доброго!

48732737 over 8 years ago

Здравей/Ciao/Hello Andy,

I see you have added a lot of information to the map of Sofia, that's great.

I just want to point out that the tag "name" is not for the civic number of a house -- the addr:housenumber tag is used for that. Putting the value in the correct tag means that software consuming the data will be able to understand it.

Also, entrance letters should be put on separate nodes with "entrance" and "ref" tags.

Here are wiki pages about this:
entrance=*
osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

If you have questions you're welcome to ask me, or on the forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=57

Happy mapping!
saintam1

(можеш да отговориш на български ако искаш / Puoi rispondere in italiano se preferisci)

48409382 over 8 years ago

Cool! Thanks for clarifying.

48409382 over 8 years ago

Hello, what language has code "tok"? I don't see it on the reference page. http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php

48345821 over 8 years ago

Привет,

Забелязах, че използвате Bing за очертаване на контурите на сградите. Но според GPS следи изображенията на Bing са с няколко метра неточни.

Съветвам Ви да иползвате изображенията на Mapbox (натистнете "b" в прозореца за редактиране). Тези изображения са и по-нови.

48063970 over 8 years ago

Здравейте,

Ако смятате да правите много промени по класификациите на улиците, моля първо да ги обсъдите на форума:

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=57

Hello,

If you would like to make lots of changes to road classifications, please discuss them on the forum first.

47746842 over 8 years ago

Hello,

You removed the "area" tag on way/43365574, which is also a highway=pedestrian way. I think the area tag here is appropriate, to indicate that the inner courtyard is also a pedestrian area. I've put it back, do let me know if you think I was wrong to do so.

Cheers
saintam1

47627412 over 8 years ago

Summary should've been "removed incorrect end_date tags". These bridges are still functional

47425996 over 8 years ago

Hello, I've changed the bus stop to a marina, (the exact tag, which maps.me apparently doesn't include in its list, is "leisure=marina"). Thanks for explaining.

46585822 almost 9 years ago

Hello, and thank you for adding a hostel to the map in Sofia. Do you happen to know what the hostel is called? Thanks

46246859 almost 9 years ago

Привет и благодаря за новите попълнения на картата. Препоръчително е да се използва кирилица за българските наименования. Аз оправих имената, които бяхте въвели.

46051865 almost 9 years ago

way/474410548 also seems to have wandered quite a bit as it now sits in Quartermile