Thank you for the reply. I find it more difficult to correct a misdrawn building when it already has address info attached. I thought I'd read that adding non-split buildings wasn't recommended but I can't actually find evidence for that, sorry! Thank you for updating mistakes you've seen and for agreeing to be more careful. I don't want to stop your mapping progress because it is really helpful.

Hiya. I don't believe this is a public footpath but if it is then you should use designation=public_footpath
foot=designated
prow_ref=*. I can't tell from aerial imagery that bicycles are prohibited but I may be mistaken. It wasn't mapped as a bridleway before, only a path.

Hi! It would be more useful to tag access=private than to tag bicycle=no, given that private access is of course allowed.

Hello! Thank you for updating the map. The best way to mark permanently closed things is with the disused: lifecycle prefix. E.g. here it would be disused:amenity=post_office . I will update the node for you :)

Thank you. I understand your original rationale, and it's great you've fixed things. :)

Hello. I'm concerned that many of the buildings you have added here are imprecise outlines and are poorly aligned to the shape of the buildings. Additionally, the buildings haven't been split so will be difficult to assign addresses to. Please be cautious using AI to map in OSM. Quality over quantity! An AI map is already available from Overture.

Hello. Is pedestrian access prohibited? A lack of pavements is best tagged with sidewalk=no. foot=no means it's prohibited, not that it's inadvisable.