Hello ayowyoqrjjmwi!
Thank you for contacting me and I appreciate the information you shared. I agree, the suggested changes you mentioned sound like good edits to me.
Happy mapping!

Hola ayowyoqrjjmwi!
Gracias por contactarme y agradezco la información que compartió. Estoy de acuerdo, los cambios sugeridos que mencionaste me parecen buenas ediciones.
¡Feliz mapeo!

Hello tbi1233, thank you for confirming and updating this. Happy mapping!

Hello, ryunezm!
I am reaching out about some overlapping highways (way/96324479, way/96391672, way/555079809, way/96070542, way/806217250) I noticed when running a validation around Cartagena de Indias.
Whenever there are validation warnings regarding overlapping highways, we ideally want to either remove the overlapping highways or add appropriate layer, bridge, or tunnel tags. This page layer=* demonstrates how to add appropriate layer tags. Additionally, this page osm.wiki/JOSM/Validator identifies potential validation warnings, which includes a section on overlapping highways. Furthermore, this page https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/becoming-a-power-mapper/fixing-common-mapping-issues/ shows how to run a validator in JOSM. I hope this information was helpful for your future editing efforts in OSM.
Have a wonderful day, and happy mapping!

Correction: Comment is added a footway, steps, and a no right turn restriction along Transversal 154 #adt

Hello AngocA. You're welcome! I am happy to help with keeping Colombia's map in good shape. Thank you for the suggestion. Happy Mapping!

Hola AngocA, gracias por comunicarte. Estaba revisando datos de carreteras con imágenes en esta región y noté que todas las imágenes aéreas muestran las casas al final de los carriles. Cuando nos referimos a los rastros de GPS de Strava que están abiertos para su uso en OSM, podemos ver que hay personas viajando en ellos, así que los agregué nuevamente. En mi opinión, esto no parecía ser un error ya que no hubo ninguna construcción importante que hubiera eliminado los edificios. Gracias por tus sugerencias.

Hello AngocA, thanks for reaching out. I was reviewing road data against imagery in this region and noticed that all aerial imagery shows the houses at the end of the lanes. When referring to Strava GPS traces that are open for use in OSM, we can see that there are people traveling on them so I added them back. This did not seem to be an error in my opinion as there was no major construction that would have removed the buildings. Thank you for your suggestions.

Correction: Source used was Bing aerial imagery; Esri World Imagery.

Correction:
Comment is "Added a few footways, crossing tags, covered=yes tags, building, and service road, and realigned some of the footways and service roads at the Universidad Nacional del Altiplano de Puno. #adt"
Source used was Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta; Bing aerial imagery.

Correction:
Comment is "Added a few footways, crossing tags, covered=yes tags, building, and service road, and realigned some of the footways and service roads at the Universidad Nacional del Altiplano de Puno."
Source used was Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta; Bing aerial imagery.

Hi Ferrocarriles de México, thanks for your edits, information and updates! I think that way/913575834 should also be changed to motorway_link to match the surrounding data. Happy mapping!

Hi Ferrocarriles de México, thank you for bringing this to my attention. I reclassified those ways to trunk and trunk links due to some service and residential roads accessing the motorway [way/786258263, way/766106284, way/766105934], and because I couldnt identify any toll booths along the westbound and eastbound ways. The México/Etiquetado de vías page [osm.wiki/ES:México/Etiquetado_de_vías], points out that motorways are "direct highways with restricted access from adjacent roads,", and that "they usually have a toll system". With the ways not having any toll booths or restricted access on the westbound and eastbound ways, I chose trunk and trunk links for those roads. I agree with the northbound and southbound being a motorway as there is restricted access and can identify toll booths.

Gracias por traer esto a mi atención. Mi justificación para agregar una vía con sentido única fueron los recursos públicos de Mapillary. Indica que el camino aquí es de un solo sentido, pero parece que las imágenes de Mapillary son antiguas. Feliz mapeo!
------------------------------------
Thanks for bringing this to my attention. My justification for adding a oneway was Mapillary public resources. It indicates the road here is a oneway but it looks like the Mapillary images are old. Happy mapping!

Hi, thanks for reaching out. I was just updating the link classifications and oneways but I am no longer working on this intersection. Happy Mapping!

Hola ayowyoqrjjmwi!

Me comunico con esperanza para tratar de entender sus cambios de clasificación recientemente en la Ciudad de México. En algunos casos la etiqueta de clasificación fue cambiada y comentas que usaste documentación oficial, como en estos cambios changeset/132727597 (& otros changeset/132765373). Me podrías hacer el favor de compartir esos documéntales oficiales, si es posible?

Adicionalmente, note que reclasificaste unas carreteras de alto uso dentro de la Ciudad de México. Eso esta causando problemas con la transición de clasificaciones donde la clasificación del motorway cambia rápidamente hacia bajo en lugares como la Avenida Aquiles Serdán [way/914026450 & way/914026451] & Avenida Insurgentes Norte [way/1148322326 & way/914022223].

Algunas de estas clasificaciones también han dejado algunas clasificaciones extrañas, donde un lado de la calzada de la Avenida Lázaro Cárdenas es un trunk [way/220965025] y el otro lado de la calzada es primary [way/853364423]. México tiene una página de políticas con respeto a las clasificaciones de trunk como “diseñadas para ser de alta velocidad y contar con dos calzadas separadas.” (osm.wiki/ES:México/Etiquetado_de_v%C3%ADas).

Feliz Mapeo!

Correction: Sources used were Bing aerial imagery; Mapillary

Hello beatnickgr, Thanks for reaching out. A user reverted a changeset in the area which resulted in floating data that my history is on, originally when it was created it was part of a tertiary road feature. I can remove the nodes that were disconnected and reconnect the crossing.

Okay, I will remove the crosswalk based on your local knowledge. Happy Mapping!

Okay, voy a remover el cruce peatonal de tu información de encuestas. Feliz Mapeo!

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. The available imageries indicate there is a crosswalk here. Do you have survey knowledge or another resource? If so, I can remove the crosswalk.

Gracias por traer esto a mi atención. Las imágenes disponibles indican que hay un cruce peatonal aquí. ¿Tiene usted información de encuestas o quizá un otro tipo de recurso? En ese caso, yo puedo remover el cruce peatonal. Gracias.

Correction: Sources used were Mapillary; Esri World Imagery.

Thank you for your insight. I can return the oneway to how it previously was based on your local knowledge.