:thumbsup:

Again, you're basing this on 2011 imagery and you're managed to remove the name "Norbreck Avenue", breaking https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=989747 . The south west of this area looks to have been turned into a new residential area that doesn't appear on the available imagery. The parking aisles you've added in that corner no longer exist.

But in doing this you've got rid of the extra information the local mapper has added, including the name ("Imperial Gardens", breaking https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=398754) and the surface type.

Are you sure this is "Crosbill Way" and not "Crossbill Way"? OS Locator seems to suggest the latter: https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=1000405

Is it really Meadowview Road rather than Meadow View Road? If so, I'll add a not:name= tag to make sure nobody comes along to try and change it to match the OS Locator entry (https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=921537)

Sorry I've had to revert this in my changeset changeset/67744561

So, the problem here is that you've based your changes on Bing imagery that's from 2011 when there was a large industrial building here. It is now housing estate. You've removed at least one feature ("Fairlane Drive" https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=1001950) which doesn't appear in the 2011 imagery but was added by mappers more local to the area. Did you not think it strange that someone had added a small park and playground that didn't appear to have any correspondence to the imagery you were looking at?

Did you mean to remove the name from Manor Road (way/171367033/history#2)? It broke a match against OS Locator https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=481742

You also managed to change this road's name to "w", breaking a match against OS Locator (https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=904700). Be careful!

Cool - I'll add a not:name= tag to it to try and prevent anyone renaming it back to what OS Locator suggests (https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=989739) which is clearly wrong in this case.

https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=1000249
Creet's Hill? Greet's Hill? Either way, something here deserves a not:name or an alt_name

https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=1000249
Creet's Hill? Greet's Hill? Either way, something here deserves a not:name or an alt_name

(from osborne avenue, that is)

Careful - when you did this you removed the highway=residential tag, which is how OSM identifies what this feature actually is. Fixed in my changeset changeset/66660517

If you're sure, I'll add a not:name= tag so this doesn't get flagged up as a mismatch: https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=749429

Think you managed to remove the name "Peacehaven" in this edit, breaking a match: https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=579509

Deliberate?

I suspect you managed to remove the whole of Alma Terrace in this edit, breaking the OS Locator match: https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=847382

Ok, but you seem to have renamed them both to Dorrington Way, which why it's showing up as broken in the aforementioned link.

Hi, did you mean to remove the name "Deveraux Close" in this edit? It broke a match against OS Locator: https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=234567

Whether to show it or not is the render's decision. I've seen plenty of people refer to MK roads as just their name, "Grafton Street" etc.