Hi - Careful when merging two ways - this has given the resulting way the name "The Grangeway;Vera Avenue", which breaks an OS Locator match: http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=741864

The fact that the two ways had different names suggests to me that perhaps they shouldn't be merged at all. OS Locator lists the two separately and the split appears to be by the rail bridge: http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=779364

Are you sure this is Crofts Lane and not Crosts Lane as OS Locator thinks: http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=217215

If you're sure, I'll add a not:name tag to make it explicitly clear and stop people wanting to change it back.

If you're really sure this is Brindle Lane and not Brindles Lane as OS thinks it is (http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=113919) it'd be good to add a not:name tag for it.

Did you mean to delete Moss Terrace here? http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=914502

Cool.

Did you mean to delete "Silver Road" (http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=671645) in this changeset? It is in the middle of a building site so I guess it may well not exist any more...

Careful when merging ways - by default it gives the new way a name made by concatenating the old way names. In this case "Binford Place; Chapel Street", which is not quite right and a bit ugly. I fixed this in my changeset changeset/33367109

I'm assuming I'm right assigning the name "Binford Place" to the road alongside the river here - it is according to ordnance survey: http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=86617

If this is wrong then please tell me.

Did you mean to remove the name "Empingham Road" in this changeset? http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=266420 http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=266421

Right approach entirely - sounds like you're on top of it. Just checking it wasn't a mistake. (If you want you can add the osm.wiki/Tag:old_name=... tag to it if you determine it's no longer called this)

Did you mean to remove the name of "Penkin Close" here? http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=922303

Great stuff. Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Nice one. Still missing OS Locator entries from friedchick & boiled chick's spree: http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=487785 http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=491244

You've managed to create a lot of untagged "Points" in this changeset that aren't tagged with anything and so don't mean anything. Were you trying to make them part of "Garden Walk"?

Hi, I made a small fix to this in my changeset changeset/32760083 - please don't put generic descriptions ("(private cul-de-sac)") in the "name" field. There are generally specific ways of notating things like this if you look a bit closer in the object's properties panel. I'd also be quite conservative tagging things as "private" because an awful lot of roads that claim to be "private" are actually public rights of way and the "private" merely indicates that it is not the council that does the upkeep of the road. Marking things as "private" will stop e.g. satnavs working on these roads.

Are you sure this is all called Commercial place? Because Ordnance Survey seems to think it's Teats Hill Road http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=731642

Did you mean to remove the name "Strode Gardens" from way/4220216 ?

You've left no highway tags on way/59392867

Ah ok I'll set it as old_name=Old Bellgate Wharf then.

If you're 100% sure this is Place and not Wharf, I'll give it a not:name= tag so (hopefully) nobody tries to change it back to Wharf (because that's what the ordnance survey database says). Are you sure?

The tag man_made=street_cabinet may be appropriate for this: man_made=street_cabinet