Hey, user204938! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)

Hey, REMIND! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)

Hey, REMIND! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)

Hey, Lavignein! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)

Hey, minseo! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)

Hey, astrangel! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)

Hey, codered2! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)

Hey, SeokYellow! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)

Hey, foxstar maje! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)

Hey, foxstar maje! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)

Hey, 안녕하세요! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)

The elimination can be verified here http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45890302

hi!
Thanks for contributing with openstreetmap, but checking your changes, I found that you deleted a natural = wood that was added by another user, could detail the reason.

Hi nyuriks!
Thank you for pointing this out and fixing it, it was one of my first edits, so it's probably a beginner mistake.

Hi Rothan22!

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. While working in this area I noticed you deleted a freeway service which is clearly visible in the satellite imagery Bing.

Hi virasumba!

I see that you deleted landuse's that are clearly seen in satellite image Bing, which added by another user, to which such elimination is due?

Hi SWF8!
Thanks for pointing this out. I think it's because of the autocomplete action in JOSM, but will be careful while adding names. I also have run a query to find same mistakes around the US and I didn't find anything, notify me if you find them, please!
Thanks for your feedback again.

Hi Oba510,
Thank you for notifying me about this issue. I have reverted my changes and the changes can be found here: changeset/45299888. I will be more careful with my edits. Thanks again.

Hi again Oba510,
Thanks again for letting me know about this and also clarifying what tags are apt. The changes have been done accordingly. They can be found in this changeset: changeset/45299739.

hi SHARCRASH!

With regards to the comment about my change, my apologies for having removed this tag and thanks for revertiro but according to the wiki building=ruins "building = ruins" are applied on areas in any case would apply this other tag "ruins = yes" and specify it According to this other wiki ruins=* the type of ruin.

Thanks for your feedback.