OpenStreetMap
radiotrefoil's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 106238147 | over 4 years ago | Hi, could you explain why you removed the suburb tag from Kemps Creek? |
| 105866107 | over 4 years ago | *kiata |
| 104721712 | over 4 years ago | Hello there, thanks for your efforts here. I've noticed that the Christchurch city boundary has unclosed segments on the west side, and it seems that the Christchurch District boundary is somewhat on top of the city boundary. We have been discussing improving these boundaries on the OpenStreetMap World discord server and would appreciate your help, so if you would like to contribute please let me know.
|
| 94745408 | over 4 years ago | Hi, thanks for the clarification, I was tagging the area:highway based on area:highway=* |
| 105387959 | over 4 years ago | More details: changeset was https://osmcha.org/changesets/105386680/
|
| 94745408 | over 4 years ago | Hi, can you explain further and link your changeset with the deletion? Thanks |
| 101824709 | over 4 years ago | Whoops, accidentally uploaded wrong description. Supposed to be sewerage infrastructure in North katoomba |
| 101654207 | over 4 years ago | Ah, yes it appears that iD cannot handle order when splitting osm.wiki/Relation:route#Order_matters
|
| 101654207 | over 4 years ago | Thanks for the clarification and fix, I didn't realise that ways were ordered in a relation. I suppose this is information that iD withholds but JOSM does not? The GWH ways were split to add a school zone conditional speed limit and the railway way was split to add cutting=yes |
| 101654207 | over 4 years ago | Can you elaborate on what the problem with the relations was? I split some ways on the relations mentioned (to add tags) but that's it. No idea what I did wrong and can't figure it out from osmose or your latest changeset descriptions |
| 99989769 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, did you mean to tag the house address with addr:housenumber=* instead of name=*
|
| 99603128 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, not sure if you meant to create tens of thousands of untagged nodes here? Quite a few of your past changesets are like this.
|
| 90356462 | almost 5 years ago | whoops, yeah must have broken the relation, this was one of my early edits. My apologies and thanks for fixing |
| 97234231 | almost 5 years ago | 👉😎👉 |
| 96637174 | almost 5 years ago | Yeah that certainly seems like a better fit. I'll change this and the other one. Thanks |
| 96673040 | almost 5 years ago | Yes, your edits are safely on the database and the amphitheatre track is marked as impassable past the closure. Not sure what routing service you're using, but often it takes time for these things (especially 3rd party apps, etc) to refresh their own database from the OSM master copy. So yeah, everything looks fine to me. |
| 96637174 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, yeah that is usually certainly the case but I feel like this is still a grey area that the wiki hasn't encompassed well yet. Have you seen the discussion at: osm.wiki/Talk:Tag:natural%3Dvalley#Valley_as_relation.3F
|
| 96631951 | almost 5 years ago | Thanks for your suggestions, yeah I added the multipolygon relations tentatively because I was planning on enclosing them in an area once we figure out what the watershed bounds are. I understand your point, but rather than removing the relation entirely, is there another relation type you suggest would be more appropriate? If not, I will just add the valley tags to that bit of the river as you suggest. N.B. Nortons Creek is a part of Kanimbla valley going from the GNB description. https://proposals.gnb.nsw.gov.au/public/geonames/d41a70e6-2eae-4b1f-a198-045c47c52eff |
| 96696684 | almost 5 years ago | a summary of the changes;
|
| 96673040 | almost 5 years ago | Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits, saves me having to go down the amphitheatre track myself. It's a bit unusual to see OSM mappers around this area so I was wondering - are you a local of the Blue Mountains? Hope you enjoy the newly updated map here.
|