Hello,

Thank you for taking the time to review our changeset. We have made the necessary modifications based on your feedback by adding the barrier type as "bar," using Bing Street View as a reference. You can find the updated information in changeset #135153039.
We were unable to verify the access restrictions using Street View. If there are any access restrictions that need to be added, please do let us know, and we will make the necessary updates.
Thanks once again and looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
rababdul

Hello Alzyee,

Thank you for reviewing our change set and highlighting the issue. Apologies for the incorrect edits. We have made the necessary corrections in the change set 130601352. Thanks once again for the feedback provided, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
rababdul

Hello Abdulrhman,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and highlighting the issue. We always confine our edits to small geographical location and this is an honest mistake from our end. Going ahead, we will ensure not to repeat such errors again. We are looking forward to learn more from you.

Thanks & Regards,
rababdul

Hello MxxCon,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and making the necessary corrections. Apologies for incorrect edits made by our editor. It's an honest mistake from our end. We have provided feedback to the editor to avoid such mistakes in the future edits. Thanks once again for fixing the issue, looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
rababdul

Hello MxxCon,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and making the necessary corrections. Apologies for incorrect edits made by our editor. It's an honest mistake from our end. We have provided feedback to the editor to avoid such mistakes in the future edits. Thanks once again for fixing the issue, looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
rababdul

Hello,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the edit.

Apologies for incorrect road digitization. It's an honest mistake from our end. Going forward, we will ensure to not repeat such errors again.

Thanks once again for fixing the issue, looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
rababdul

Hello,
Thanks for the valuable feedback. I have added the road based on available resources. Thanks for correcting my edit.

Regards,
rababdul

Hi,
Sorry for the inconvenience caused. I have edited the highway classification to driveway now. Please look into the changeset (107491058) with modifications.
Thanks for the valuable feedback.
Regards,
rababdul

Hi skyper,
thanks for the response, apologies for the delayed reply. we are already working on updating hashtags in our edits, please give us some time to get back on it.we are talking with DWG to take a long term decision. We will be happy to implement the changes whatever that benefits the larger community

Hi Skyper,
We add Segments based on available OSM resources. As already informed in case of ambiguity(without proper confirmation) we do not add access to restrain from vandalism. I have added access = private based on the Information provided by "torstiohneh" saying it is "Private Property" I apologise for missing the Gate in my edit. However, I thank you on your suggestion and have made changes accordingly (changeset: 90769065). I would Consider this learning in my future edits. Always happy to learn from Community and contribute to the OSM data quality.
Regards,
Abdul Qader

appreciating your time for checking into our edits. I have not added any private access since the gate is present only at the one side of the entity and I am not sure of the access tags of the entity. Adding the private access as confirmed by the community member. please find the changeset() for the suggested modifications. always happy to learn from the community.

thanks for looking into our edits. Apologies, I have mistakenly added the private tag to the driveways. Please find the changeset() for the suggested modifications. After the feedback from the community, we have made the appropriate changes in the addition of private tags to driveways. we have a second level of review for changeset we have created. sorry, i am not aware of the German language. this is not an automated reply. we are manually going through your queries and replying them

Thanks for your response. Our lead had initiated the discussion in the OSM forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=800092#p800092. Thanks for your valuable inputs.

Thanks for your response. Our lead had initiated the discussion in the OSM forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=800092#p800092. Thanks for your valuable inputs.

thanks for checking into our edits and providing us with the valuable inputs. as mentioned in the changeset discussion 89966935.our team is working on adding a #tag to edits and soon will be implemented. always happy to learn from the community.

Hi Skyper,
Thanks for checking into our edits and providing us with the valuable inputs. I have not added any access tags as there are as no resources supporting it. As mentioned in the changeset discussion 89966935, our team is working on adding a #tag to edits and soon will be implemented. Can you let me know what is the ground source mentioned in the comment I didn’t get it.
Always happy to learn from the community.

Hi Limes,
Thanks for checking into our edits. I have not added the barrier as we don’t have enough resources(street side) to validate it. we are keeping our best efforts to add the quality data into the osm. I am glad to see that the local knowledge is improvising our edits. thanks and appreciating your time for clearly explaining the issue. we are working on the access tags to incorporate your suggestions into our work flow. once again, thanks for the valuable suggestions. always happy to learn from the community.

Regards,
Rababdul

Hi, Thanks for looking into our edits. I have missed the geometry as I had created the road from a different zoom level. It is a mistake from our end. Please find the changeset(85870102) for the suggested modifications. I will make sure all my future edits will will reflect the upmost quality. thanks for the quick suggestion always happy to learn from the community

Hi User_5359,
Thank you for looking into this and correcting the edit. i will take this as a learning for my future edits. Looking forward to adding meaningful data.
Regards
rababdul

Hi Andy,

I didn't add any motor vehicle tag in this case, but by mistake added a wrong changeset comment. I added a missing service road in this case and there is nothing related to motor vehicle tag. Will try not to repeat this mistake again.

Regards,
rababdul