Hi, a few days ago it was detected that someone had inadvertently merged this mural with the Boulder admin node, which caused the rendering problem. It was caught and reverted, but may take a few days for the rendering to catch up. I fixed the art URL in the meantime, since someone noticed it during the kerfuffle.

Hi, thanks for your help with the OSMUS task. However, I believe the two campgrounds you mapped are actually scrap yards (see the other scrap yard just a bit south) - I live in the area and I’m pretty sure there is no legitimate camping happening up there on the private property. Did you have another source of information? If not, can you please correct the tagging? Thanks, phidauex.

Hi, I don't see any evidence yet of Eagle Drive and Ibis Lane - did they just get built (as in the last month or two) or are they proposed? Can you help clarify the source? Thanks.

Hi, some of these changes don't seem realistic - for instance, I doubt that that Sewer Authority building is a park, a government office and a wastewater treatment plant. Please stop adding tag combinations like this without reading up on the tag definitions in the OSM wiki.

Hi, thanks for updating bike lane information! Near and dear to my heart. I did want to suggest a tip - for this section of Sable Blvd., you removed cycleway=lane (probably because there is no real lane, just the sharrows). In this case, however, you may want to use the tag cycleway=shared_lane which indicates that the main travel lane is designated for bikes. Most routers don't place much stock in that fact, but many do display it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117221663

Thanks for extending the 287 trunk up. 287 is gradually growing toward continuity here! I'm thinking the next step is to connect 287 through loveland and fort collins as a trunk - I don't think I-25 is a "real" bypass here. CO 14 is already trunk, and then the other major connection would be US 34 which can be upgraded. I think that would put the Fort Collins/Greeley/Loveland/Longmont area in a good position regarding trunk classification.

FYI, I'm extending the trunk status on US40 further into CO. Took it to Kremmling so far, where we need to make a decision on whether to stay on US 40 (reflects formal classifications) or send the trunk down CO 9 (reflects more recent usage patterns for thru traffic).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115655256

Hi, I see you are working on highway classifications in CO. If you would, take a moment to review the trunk proposals on the CO wiki to see what has consensus and is still up for discussion. osm.wiki/Colorado/Highway_Classification

At the risk of starting an edit war, I'd like to ask that we move some of the CO reclassification discussions to the wiki. I've added some additional comments to the trunk proposals section, and we may want to work them out there rather than reverting each others edits. osm.wiki/Colorado/Highway_Classification#Trunk_Roads

Hi, I wish you would have messaged before reverting this change - working with NM mappers we did determine this is an important route meeting the revised trunk definitions. I'm happy to accept feedback, but many of the changes you're making have already reached a level of community consensus.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115676781

Reverted in changeset/113587451
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113417576

Hi, welcome to OSM. I'm not sure if you realize this, but edits made here impact real maps that people and businesses use every day. Making fictional edits is considered vandalism and isn't appreciated. If you would like to learn how to use the map editor to improve the map, then I recommend checking out LearnOSM.org for some useful walkthroughs. In the meantime I'm going to revert the two edits you've made so far.

Thanks, I have used your synced alignments before in JOSM, they are quite helpful, and Mesa County’s imagery is very good. In this case, I’ve noticed some skew in the canyons in all the imagery sources, so the alignments I updated were to correct my own initial rough trace from trail maps (before the trail was visible in any imagery), and I aligned to Strava heat map wherever available to avoid imagery skew.

Is there somewhere you noticed that I appear to be off? Happy to go back over and see if there is anything I missed or over-corrected.

We were the ones with a baby trailer with a CO flag on it, if you saw us! Your import looked good, I just adjusted the underpass geometry a bit, extended the trail access tags to the whole segment, and added them to the route relation for the overall trail.

Good edits and thanks for updating the map!

Hi, thanks for adding this! I just rode it and was about to add it when I noticed you had beat me by two hours. :)

I tweaked the geometry a bit from my GPX trace and added surface information and some details. Can you confirm if the trail is called Boulder Canyon Trail, not an extension of the Boulder Creek Trail?

Hi, for the First Look trail I used a combination of written descriptions of the trail in some of the CPW and TPL literature, and a blog post with some photos and trail descriptions. For the geometry, Strava heatmaps (which was probably the custom imagery in the source tag). It was enough for me to be >95% confident I was mapping the right trail.

Now, for the other trails and existing roads, I chose not to try mapping any for now… I know they are under active trail work, some are closed, some will probably be revegetated, etc… It might be worth the effort to trace some of the linework as private track roads, but it isn’t clear what will go away and what will become real trails yet. If CPW shared a map that would be helpful.

Thanks, we can see how that sits with people for now. The road is in a unique state because it has gained its importance to the network "accidentally" because of the amount of E/W traffic increasing in the last few years.

Do you know if "hgv=discouraged" is supported by any data consumers?

Hi, I see you upgraded County Road 50E (Country Club) from residential to secondary. While the traffic counts probably justify this, the community in the area has been working with the city to get some restrictions placed on the road (such as no trucks) because the road is being heavily used to bypass onto I25, and putting a lot of loud traffic into a residential neighborhood.

As a local compromise, we've been keeping it tagged as residential and reflecting other restrictions in order to prevent too much unintentional routing here until formal changes with the city can be determined. Do you mind changing 50E back to residential? Thanks - phidauex
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103955688

Reverted - a sampling of the changes showed all fantasy edits. If some are correct, they can't be easily separated from the known bad edits. mruss13 - please do not make false changes to the map - these maps are real maps used by delivery services, emergency services, and people living their lives. If you would like to contribute to the map, please spend some time exploring, and look for places in your neighborhood where you can make changes that improve the map or correct errors. Thanks.

Hi, thanks for your additions, I love these little neighborhood footways. As a tip, please connect the footway to the road on either end, rather than letting it "float", that lets pedestrian routers use the footway to suggest walking and connect to the sidewalks. Happy mapping!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102148458