https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index/pull/1129
Think this through, wolfgang8741/Jon Brier sent a message to WVGISTC / WVU about this question. What can you say about this?
As far as I understood, they allow creating derivative products from it as far as it's not redistributed (so it doesn't get reshared to another server or like that) and they encourage it, just the imageries aren't taken by themselves but the counties.

Okay, I could revert it without a problem.

Okay, reverted it.

Thank you, also changeset/104698612 has to be reverted

I also tried to revert something, but my quota exceeded, and this is also caused a problem. So I tried to solve the issue myself, but I think i could not achieve it. Sorry for that again.

Also, sorry if I cause inconvenience. I will look more thoroughly on things.

The thing is that I think you should revert my reverts in the order, and then revert the changesets even if they say "Reverted". I don't have time right now, i'm preparing for my exams in university.

to be honest, I am the only one who worked on this area, so nobody else touched it in the last 10 days.

I think the problem is i didn't go from the last to the first, and this may cause the huge mistake, thus i cannot revert this, I think.

Reverted.

Reverted.

Please revert this. Don't question me, i got a DWG warning, just i exceeded my quota of Overpass turbo

Reverted.

Reverted.

This changeset is due to revert, just JOSM reverter doesn't do anything.

changeset/104726989
the JOSM reverter doesn't work correctly for the changeset in this particular case, so i couldn't revert that particular one. If you can, please do that, i don't want to overwrite anything.

"wolfgang8741 on the issue, because he spoke last time with Kurt Donaldson and Frank LaFone. " Actually that was back in October 2020

Yes, I know about the issue, i might revert the thing, because actually there are 3-4 changesets affected by this. The WV GIS TC told something to wolfgang8741 that "everything can be used of WV GIS Clearinghouse to OSM (public domain), unless explicitly stated". The problem is, that on WV GIS TC there is a declaration "imagery web service is for view only", but why don't they just grant permission? It is weird, because the Clearinghouse has the purpose to reuse something. Actually, this question is on rise on OSMUS Slack, but we haven't gotten any reply back from wolfgang8741 on the issue, because he spoke last time with Kurt Donaldson and Frank LaFone.
The problem is, that they didn't explicitly stated the stuff.

Because you warned me (also DUGA warned me), i think i have to revert the stuff which contains the "WV GIS TC Imagery" like this changeset, and if any of the WVU members grant permission only for OSM mappers to trace their imagery, then the stuff i could not trace from NAIP/Maxar/Bing/Esri will be corrected.

I hope this clarification is good.

Well, i asked it in Discord and i got it that the cut-off areas should be mapped as scrub

Some areas have cut logs, but those don't belong into the forest anymore, unless it's going to be readded. For more questions, feel free to ask, since i'm an experienced mapper. :)
I'm available on slack.openstreetmap.us.