Bing imagery seems to show this as a new residential area under construction?

None of the new "guessed items" have any sort of fixme on them.

FYI: a mechanical edit can be done by hand - just a set of unsurveyed armchair edits - supposedly fixing the same item.

I believe that there are things called horse stiles - unless you survey them you won't know what the issue was. And without a note on OSM then local mappers won't know that you've just modified stuff without surveying.

This looks more like a (mechanical) edit to remove stiles from bridleways? Has this been agreed on talk-gb?

Mapping style changed to mark schools as areas. So maybe node is just old?

No very easy way to check remotely -- maybe add a note so local mappers can be prompted to check -- maybe both are wrong?

Smaller changeset would help local mappers (and be safer in case your editor crashes).

Smaller changeset would help local mappers (and be safer in case your editor crashes).

Have removed the was:building outlines.

The hgv tag on Tanhouse Lane looks odd -- Bing Streetside seems to have it as ?"Except for loading"? https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=e05770e1-7a1a-4519-9d27-6254d0b6b7bc&cp=51.566035~-2.406859&lvl=19&dir=262.34555&pi=-5.756836&style=x&mo=om.1~z.3&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027

hgv=unsuitable seems subjective and doesn't match signage?

I've redrawn this - there are 2 separate ways -- your version seems to go through a wall. Bing Streetside helps.

Just wondered what you were using to map the houses - there's no uploaded GPX tracks and Bing imagery doesn't show any.

Presumably this is drawn from personally acquired GPS data and not copied from any copyrighted maps?

I've redrawn the service roads so that they match existing buildings by offsetting the imagery slightly.

Deleting information is rarely the best approach -- I've marked them with fixme's so that they can be checked.

Probably needs reverting it's one hoop -- not a pitch

The building you edited is part of "The Mall" it is not "The Mall" -- have corrected it.

I think that the smaller roundabout was drawn using ETSI clarity -- Bing just has a different offset you may need to adjust it.

Bridge over cycletrack
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.5431677334852&lng=-2.6358287002277905&z=17&pKey=9CSHVr57GXzXMp4Zzaduyw&focus=photo

Not sure what's happened here -- this was carefully mapped from an GPS and ground survey -- there are no tunnels -- bridges have been deleted and items that are visible on mapillary -- from the ground survey.

Is there any reason not to revert this?

I've added a note that this needs to be surveyed -- if it isn't signed then access tags shouldn't be inferred.

Reverting this - previous geometry matched Bing imagery well and didn't try to link roads that aren't linked.

Previous landuse=commercial was fine. Area didn't need editing -- maybe building=office if it wasn't already.

The Aztec West edits look problematic - Cap Gemini is a not a man_made=works.