The access=private I added is correct -- I've removed the pre-existing tag that seems to confuse you. And added a note that access on the other bridge needs checking too.

Basically, the area over the stream is supposed to be only for authorised personnel (as much as I can tell from seeing one bridge).

Is it wise to add service roads to an area under construction?

I've removed the through road to Moorlands Road -- clearly not present on Bing Streetside.

This signpost is already marked node/6985964877

It looks like you're importing Sustrans copyright information into OpenStreetMap -- do you have an appropriate licence to do this? Was this discussed on the imports / talk-gb mailing lists?

It looks like you're importing Sustrans copyright information into OpenStreetMap -- do you have an appropriate licence to do this? Was this discussed on the imports / talk-gb mailing lists?

It looks like you're importing Sustrans copyright information into OpenStreetMap -- do you have an appropriate licence to do this? Was this discussed on the imports / talk-gb mailing lists?

It looks like you're importing Sustrans copyright information into OpenStreetMap -- do you have an appropriate licence to do this? Was this discussed on the imports / talk-gb mailing lists?

It looks like you're importing Sustrans copyright information into OpenStreetMap -- do you have an appropriate licence to do this? Was this discussed on the imports / talk-gb mailing lists?

It looks like you're importing Sustrans copyright information into OpenStreetMap -- do you have an appropriate licence to do this? Was this discussed on the imports / talk-gb mailing lists?

It looks like you're importing Sustrans copyright information into OpenStreetMap -- do you have an appropriate licence to do this? Was this discussed on the imports / talk-gb mailing lists?

ESRI imagery seems to show the removed section clearly.
Maxar premium seems to have trees obscuring the path.
Irrespective there must be some access to garages/sheds at end of the gardens.

You have connected the service road to an administrative boundary -- perhaps you could zoom in more next time -- or even better use a filter to avoid changing boundaries if you are only adding service roads.

I'll try to fix it.

I reverted this -- doesn't seem to be present on Maxar imagery and it would be somewhat unusual to have a service road near to a bus stop.

Bing Streetside shows a kerb -- it's probably more of a footway -- so I've modified it.

Looks like parking areas have suffered from you moving nodes? I'll try and fix it.

Do you have a link for this turn restriction? More likely to be "straight ahead only" not "no right turn" surely?

It's already marked as 1 Cathedral Square.

A lot of Bristol suburbs have now been duplicated as peaks.

Can someone please revert - or I'll do so when I can

Congratulations on the move.

I'd recommend keeping the name the same as that on the external signage.
Obviously a shorter name is more likely to be displayed :-)

If you want to describe a more legal owner, then maybe operator="formal company name" might be better.