Maybe ask some questions on the talk-gb mailing list -- they may have some better ideas.

Ugggh, it sounds like you are copying from other maps?

I think you probably need to revert some of this unless you have an explicit licence to use South Glostershire council data in OpenStreetMap -- it's extremely likely to be Crown Copyright and probably mixed in with Ordnance Survey data.

Do you have a better change set comment - what did you modify?

This just looks like an import from rowmaps - you need to revert your changes (or I can) and follow the import guidelines as specified on the OSM wiki.

Please don't move existing buildings -- just realign Maxar to match them -- ESRI clarity is recommeded on the Bristol wiki page. I'll fix them up.

What's the source of the new names -- most of the roads aren't signposted. Ditto the roundabout "centres"?

It's usually just a "code" BSxx yyy on the front paper sheet with collection times -- you can see matched post boxes at https://osm.mathmos.net/postboxes/progress/BS/BS34/#13/51.5201/-2.5648

Has it got a ref?

Is there a road sign for this?

The changeset comment seems a little misleading?

psv=designated / bus=designated is a perfectly valid value why did it need changing?

No worries -- just seemed odd that an office block was marked as a generator.

highway = f ?

What were the routing errors?

Surely only the panel area should be mapped -- not the whole building

"name" should really be what's on the signage.
Moved the names to description.

No worries -- thanks for reviewing

It's already mapped as an area :-)

If you want a discussion start a topic on talk-gb as suggested previously.

If you want less of a blunderbuss approach then make the individual change(s) yourself.

Think this will need to be reverted: there's a clear cycle path -- not a footpath https://binged.it/2LDjuKd

Nowhere near the docks :-)

I've squared up (orthogonalised) some of your edits.

ESRI clarity is the best source for imagery -- unless Maxar is newer